Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round

被引:11
作者
Bayat, Bardia Taghavi [1 ]
Gill, Suki [2 ]
Siva, Shankar [2 ]
Tai, Keen Hun [2 ,3 ]
Joon, Michael Lim [2 ]
Foroudi, Farshad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bendigo Base Hosp, Bendigo, Vic, Australia
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, East Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Audit; Radiotherapy; Urology; RANZCR; Quality; AUDIT; IMPROVEMENT; FEEDBACK; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-13-148
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) initiated a unique instrument to audit the quality of patient notes and radiotherapy prescriptions. We present our experience collected over ten years from the use of the RANZCR audit instrument. Methods: In this study, the results of data collected prospectively from January 1999 to June 2009 through the audit instrument were assessed. Radiotherapy chart rounds were held weekly in the uro-oncology tumour stream and real time feedback was provided. Electronic medical records were retrospectively assessed in September 2009 to see if any omissions were subsequently corrected. Results: In total 2597 patients were audited. One hundred and thirty seven (5%) patients had one hundred and ninety nine omissions in documentation or radiotherapy prescription. In 79% of chart rounds no omissions were found at all, in 12% of chart rounds one omission was found and in 9% of chart rounds two or more omissions were found. Out of 199 omissions, 95% were of record keeping and 2% were omissions in the treatment prescription. Of omissions, 152 (76%) were unfiled investigation results of which 77 (51%) were subsequently corrected. Conclusions: Real-time audit with feedback is an effective tool in assessing the standards of radiotherapy documentation in our department, and also probably contributed to the high level of attentiveness. A large proportion of omissions were investigation results, which highlights the need for an improved system of retrieval of investigation results in the radiation oncology department.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department [J].
Boxer, M. ;
Forstner, D. ;
Kneebone, A. ;
Delaney, G. ;
Koh, E-S ;
Fuller, M. ;
Kaadan, N. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (04) :405-411
[2]  
*FAC RAD ONC REV C, 2000, REV OPT PAP
[3]   Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes [J].
Jamtvedt, G. ;
Young, J. M. ;
Kristoffersen, D. T. ;
O'Brien, M. A. ;
Oxman, A. D. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02)
[4]   Efficacy of an integrated continuing medical education (CME) and quality improvement (QI) program on radiation oncologist (RO) clinical practice [J].
Leong, Cheng Nang ;
Shakespeare, Thomas Philip ;
Mukherjee, Rahul K. ;
Back, Michael F. ;
Lee, Khai Mun ;
Wynne, Christopher J. ;
Lim, Keith ;
Tang, Johann ;
Zhang, Xiaojian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (05) :1457-1460
[5]  
RANZCR, 2011, PEER REV AUD INSTR
[6]   Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England [J].
Scally, G ;
Donaldson, LJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7150) :61-65
[7]   Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial [J].
Shakespeare, T. P. ;
Turner, M. ;
Chapman, A. .
AUSTRALASIAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 51 (04) :381-385
[8]   Evaluation of an audit with feedback continuing medical education program for radiation oncologists [J].
Shakespeare, TP ;
Mukherjee, RK ;
Lu, JDJ ;
Lee, KM ;
Back, MF .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2005, 20 (04) :216-221
[9]   RANZCR 2006 Peer review audit instrument [J].
Toohey, J. ;
Shakespeare, T. P. ;
Morgan, G. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2008, 52 (04) :403-413