A systems approach to restoring degraded drylands

被引:149
作者
James, Jeremy J. [1 ]
Sheley, Roger L. [2 ]
Erickson, Todd [3 ,4 ]
Rollins, Kim S. [5 ]
Taylor, Michael H. [5 ]
Dixon, Kingsley W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif, Div Agr & Nat Resources, Sierra Foothills Res & Extens Ctr, Browns Valley, CA 95918 USA
[2] ARS, USDA, Burns, OR 97720 USA
[3] Kings Pk & Bot Gardens, Perth, WA 6005, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Sch Plant Biol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[5] Univ Nevada, Dept Econ, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
desert; invasion; restoration; state-and-transition models; thresholds; TRANSITION MODELS; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; VEGETATION DYNAMICS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; STATE; NONEQUILIBRIUM; FRAMEWORK; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; THRESHOLDS;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.12090
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Drylands support over 2 billion people and are major providers of critical ecosystem goods and services across the globe. Drylands, however, are one of the most susceptible biomes to degradation. International programmes widely recognize dryland restoration as key to combating global dryland degradation and ensuring future global sustainability. While the need to restore drylands is widely recognized and large amounts of resources are allocated to these activities, rates of restoration success remain overwhelmingly low. Advances in understanding the ecology of dryland systems have not yielded proportional advances in our ability to restore these systems. To accelerate progress in dryland restoration, we argue for moving the field of restoration ecology beyond conceptual frameworks of ecosystem dynamics and towards quantitative, predictive systems models that capture the probabilistic nature of ecosystem response to management. To do this, we first provide an overview of conceptual dryland restoration frameworks. We then describe how quantitative systems framework can advance and improve conceptual restoration frameworks, resulting in a greater ability to forecast restoration outcomes and evaluate economic efficiency and decision-making. Lastly, using a case study from the western United States, we show how a systems approach can be integrated with and used to advance current conceptual frameworks of dryland restoration. Synthesis and applications. Systems models for restoration do not replace conceptual models but complement and extend these modelling approaches by enhancing our ability to solve restoration problems and forecast outcomes under changing conditions. Such forecasting of future outcomes is necessary to monetize restoration benefits and cost and to maximize economic benefit of limited restoration dollars.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 739
页数:10
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Sagebrush-grass vegetation dynamics: Comparing classical and state-transition models [J].
Allen-Diaz, B ;
Bartolome, JW .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1998, 8 (03) :795-804
[2]  
Allen-Diaz B., 1996, Climate change 1995. Impacts, adaptation, P131
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIOLOGIST LONDON
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2 UNCCD
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The Great Basin Restoration Initiative, P33
[6]   Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta-analysis of Recent Papers (2000-2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals [J].
Aronson, James ;
Blignaut, James N. ;
Milton, Suzanne J. ;
Le Maitre, David ;
Esler, Karen J. ;
Limouzin, Amandine ;
Fontaine, Christelle ;
de Wit, Martin P. ;
Mugido, Worship ;
Prinsloo, Philip ;
van der Elst, Leandri ;
Lederer, Ned .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2010, 18 (02) :143-154
[7]   An assessment of restoration of biodiversity in degraded high mountain grazing lands in northern Ethiopia [J].
Asefa, DT ;
Oba, G ;
Weladji, RB ;
Colman, JE .
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 14 (01) :25-38
[8]   Empirical assessment of state-and-transition models with a long-term vegetation record from the Sonoran Desert [J].
Bagchi, Sumanta ;
Briske, David D. ;
Wu, X. B. ;
McClaran, Mitchel P. ;
Bestelmeyer, Brandon T. ;
Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2012, 22 (02) :400-411
[9]   Developing decision support tools for rangeland management by combining state and transition models and Bayesian belief networks [J].
Bashari, H. ;
Smith, C. ;
Bosch, O. J. H. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 99 (01) :23-34
[10]  
Belnap J, 2001, ECOL STU AN, V150, P177