Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test

被引:61
作者
Hoelzel, Lars P. [1 ]
Kriston, Levente [2 ]
Haerter, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Div Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Med Psychol, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Patient Preference; Informed Choice; Decision-making; Patient-caregiver Communication; Patient Satisfaction; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PATIENTS DESIRE; PRIMARY-CARE; PARTICIPATION; CONSULTATION; AUTONOMY; SYSTEMS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-13-231
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A comprehensive model of the relationships among different shared decision-making related constructs and their effects on patient-relevant outcomes is largely missing. Objective of our study was the development of a model linking decision-making in medical encounters to an intermediate and a long-term endpoint. The following hypotheses were tested: physicians are more likely to involve patients who have a preference for participation and are willing to take responsibility in the medical decision-making process, increased patient involvement decreases decisional conflict, and lower decisional conflict favourably influences patient satisfaction with the physician. Methods: This model was tested in a German primary care sample (N = 1,913). Psychometrically tested instruments were administered to assess the following: patients' preference for being involved in medical decision-making, patients' experienced involvement in medical decision-making, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with the primary care provider. Structural equation modelling was used to explore multiple associations. The model was tested and adjusted in a development sub-sample and cross-validated in a confirmatory sample. Demographic and clinical characteristics were accounted for as possible confounders. Results: Local and global indexes suggested an acceptable fit between the theoretical model and the data. Increased patient involvement was strongly associated with decreased decisional conflict (standardised regression coefficient B = -.73). Both high experienced involvement (B = .34) and low decisional conflict (B = -.28) predicted higher satisfaction with the physician. Patients' preference for involvement was negatively associated with the experienced involvement (B = -.24). Conclusion: Altogether, our model could be largely corroborated by the collected empirical data except the unexpected negative association between preference for involvement and experienced involvement. Future research on the associations among different SDM-related constructs should incorporate longitudinal studies in order to strengthen the hypothesis of causal associations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHD RBK PRINCIPLES P
[2]  
[Anonymous], PATIENT ED COUNS
[3]   Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys [J].
Benbassat, J ;
Pilpel, D ;
Tidhar, M .
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (02) :81-88
[4]   Zufriedenheit in der Arztpraxis aus PatientenperspektivePsychometrische Prüfung eines standardisierten ErhebungsinstrumentsPatient Satisfaction with Ambulatory Care PhysiciansPsychometric Testing of a Standardized Questionnaire [J].
Eva Maria Bitzer ;
Marie-Luise Dierks ;
Hans Dörning ;
Friedrich-Wilhelm Schwartz .
Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health, 1999, 7 (3) :196-209
[5]  
Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445
[6]  
Buchholz A, 2011, Klin Diagn Eval, V4, P15
[7]  
Byrne B.M., 2001, Multivariate applications book series.Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications
[8]  
Byrne B.M., 2009, J APPL QUANT METHODS, V5, P365
[9]   European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers [J].
Coulter, A ;
Jenkinson, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 15 (04) :355-360
[10]   Dilemmas in patient centeredness and shared decision making: A case for vulnerability [J].
de Haes, Hanneke .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 62 (03) :291-298