Variability of creativity judgments

被引：42

作者：

Caroff, Xavier ^{[1
]}

Besancon, Maud ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Paris 05, Inst Psychol, Lab Psychol & Neurosci Cognit, CNRS,FRE 2987, F-92774 Boulogne, France

来源：

LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES | 2008年 / 18卷 / 04期

关键词：

Creativity; Consensual assessment; Judgement; Originality; Appropriateness;

D O I：

10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.001

中图分类号：

G44 [教育心理学];

学科分类号：

0402 ; 040202 ;

摘要：

The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT), developed by Amabile [Amabile, T.M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013], is frequently used to evaluate the creativity of productions. Judgments obtained with CAT are usually reliable and valid. However, notable individual differences in judgment exist. This empirical study shows that creativity judgments for advertisements vary, depending on (1) the level of two underlying components of creativity - originality and appropriateness, (2) the creative ability of the judges, i.e. variations in their ability to be original, and finally, (3) instructions or training that they received about the topic of creativity assessment. Effects of advertisements' appropriateness and judges' ability to be original on individual differences in creativity judgments are discussed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：367 / 371

页数：5

共 30 条

[1]

Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity

[2] SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY OF CREATIVITY - A CONSENSUAL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE [J].