Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: an integration

In recent bears. 'stimulus competition' in the study of acquired behavior has referred exclusively to (a) associative competition between cues trained in Compound (e.g. overshadowing and blocking). Rarely cited are older experiments cast in the verbal learning tradition, now complemented with data from humans and rats in Pavlovian preparations, that demonstrate (b) competition between cues separately trained with a common outcome (i.e. proactive and retroactive interference). similarly neglected are numerous examples of (c) competition between outcomes separately trained with a common Cue,within the verbal learning literature (also proactive and retroactive interference) as well as within the Pavlovian literature (i.e. counterconditioning). Recent data demonstrate (d) competition between outcomes trained in compound. thereby completing the four cells of a 2 x 2 matrix (competing stimuli trained together vs. trained apart and the competing stimuli being cues or outcomes) which highlights the ubiquitous nature of associative stimulus interference/competition. Most contemporary theories of acquired behavior can account for the phenomena in one or at most two cells of this matrix. Whether a common mechanism underlies the phenomena in all four cells of the matrix is currently unclear. but until such time as data preclude a common mechanism. parsimony encourages efforts to develop a model that encompasses all four cells. Here we offer a tentative model that addresses all four cells. albeit with two processes. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.