Modified atmosphere packaging of fish salad

被引:8
作者
Metin, S [1 ]
Erkan, N [1 ]
Baygar, T [1 ]
Ozden, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Istanbul, Fac Fisheries, Dept Proc Technol, TR-34470 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
fish salad; modified-atmosphere packaging; shelf life;
D O I
10.1046/j.1444-2906.2002.00409.x
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The shelf life of fish salads in modified atmosphere was studied and compared with those of air-packaged (control) products. Samples were evaluated at 0 days, 7 days, and 14 days at 4 C, respectively. The sensory quality of modified-atmosphere packaging (MAP) groups was significantly (Pless than or equal to 0.05) higher than the control group. Control packages were below the limit of acceptability at the seventh day of storage. However, MAP samples (O-2: CO2: N-2 = 1 : 7:12 and CO2:N-2=3:7) were not rejected until the 14th day of storage. Modified-atmosphere packaging decreased the microbiological activity and the sensory score changes, as well as extending the shelf life of samples by approximately 50%.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 209
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
AHVENAINEN R, 1990, LEBENSM WISS TECHNOL, V23, P139
[2]  
[Anonymous], PRINCIPLES SENSORY E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1968, HDB LEBENSMITTEL CHE
[4]  
*ASS AN CHEM, 1990, OFF METH AN ASS AN C
[5]   SHELF-LIFE STUDIES ON CARBON-DIOXIDE PACKAGED FINFISH FROM THE GULF OF MEXICO [J].
BANKS, H ;
NICKELSON, R ;
FINNE, G .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1980, 45 (02) :157-162
[6]  
Berne S., 1994, Prepared Foods, V163, P101
[7]   MODIFIED ATMOSPHERE STORAGE OF ROCKFISH (SEBASTES-MINIATUS) AND SILVER SALMON (ONCORHYNCHUS-KISUTCH) [J].
BROWN, WD ;
ALBRIGHT, M ;
WATTS, DA ;
HEYER, B ;
SPRUCE, B ;
PRICE, RJ .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1980, 45 (01) :93-96
[8]   MODIFIED ATMOSPHERE PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY - A REVIEW [J].
CHURCH, IJ ;
PARSONS, AL .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1995, 67 (02) :143-152
[9]  
DHANANJAYA S, 1994, INT J FOOD SCI TECH, V29, P575
[10]   MICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF MODIFIED-ATMOSPHERE PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY - A REVIEW [J].
FARBER, JM .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1991, 54 (01) :58-70