Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study

被引:25
|
作者
Xu, Antonia [1 ,2 ]
Baysari, Melissa Therese [3 ]
Stocker, Sophie Lena [2 ]
Leow, Liang Joo [4 ,5 ]
Day, Richard Osborne [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Carland, Jane Ellen [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ NSW, Sch Med Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Med Sci, Discipline Biomed Informat & Digital Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ NSW, St Vincents Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Informed consent; Researchers' views; Ethics; National Statement; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ETHICS; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-020-00538-7
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Informed consent is often cited as the "cornerstone" of research ethics. Its intent is that participants enter research voluntarily, with an understanding of what their participation entails. Despite agreement on the necessity to obtain informed consent in research, opinions vary on the threshold of disclosure necessary and the best method to obtain consent. We aimed to investigate Australian researchers' views on, and their experiences with, obtaining informed consent. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 researchers from NSW institutions, working in various fields of research. Interviews were analysed and coded to identify themes. Results Researchers reported that consent involved information disclosure, understanding and a voluntary decision. They emphasised the variability of consent interactions, which were dependent on potential participants' abilities and interests, study complexity and context. All researchers reported providing written information to potential participants, yet questioned the readability and utility of this information. The majority reported using signed consent forms to 'operationalise' consent and reported little awareness of, and lack of support in implementing more dynamic informed consent procedures, such as verbal informed consent, that was fit for the purposes of their studies. Views on Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) varied. Some reported inconsistent, arduous inputs on the information form and consent process. Others expressed reliance on HRECs for guidance, viewing them as institutional safeguards. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of transparent relationships, both between researchers and participants, and between researchers and HRECs. Where the relationship with study participants was reported as more robust, researchers felt that they were better able to ensure participants made better, more informed decisions. Where the relationship with HRECs was reported as more robust, researchers were more likely to view them as institutional safeguards, rather than as bureaucratic hindrances. Conscientious and mindful researchers are paramount to ensuring the procedure accommodates individual requirements. This study advocates that when designing ethical informed consent practices, researchers should be integrated as autonomous players with a positive input on the process, rather than, in the worst case, predatory recruiters to be curtailed by information forms and oversight.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Consent in pregnancy: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of women and their healthcare professionals
    Nicholls, Jacqueline
    David, Anna L.
    Iskaros, Joseph
    Lanceley, Anne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 238 : 132 - 137
  • [32] Forensic Mental Health Tribunals: A Qualitative Study of Participants' Experiences and Views
    Livingston, James D.
    Crocker, Anne G.
    Nicholls, Tonia L.
    Seto, Michael C.
    PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2016, 22 (02) : 173 - 184
  • [33] Informed Consent and Research Involving Human Biological Material (in Polish) PDF (In Polish)
    Pawlikowski, Jakub
    DIAMETROS, 2015, 44 : 89 - 109
  • [34] Expanding the boundaries of previously obtained informed consent in research: Views from participants in the Personalised Risk-based Mammascreening study
    Lutomski, Jennifer E.
    Rainey, Linda
    de Jong, Milou
    Manders, Peggy
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (03) : 1308 - 1317
  • [35] Simple genetics language as source of miscommunication between genetics researchers and potential research participants in informed consent documents
    Morgenstern, Justin
    Hegele, Robert A.
    Nisker, Jeff
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2015, 24 (06) : 751 - 766
  • [36] The ethics of research informed consent from the Kyrgyz perspective: A qualitative study
    Kudaibergenova, Tamara
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2024,
  • [37] Procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating research participants in Qatar: findings from a qualitative investigation
    Amal Killawi
    Amal Khidir
    Maha Elnashar
    Huda Abdelrahim
    Maya Hammoud
    Heather Elliott
    Michelle Thurston
    Humna Asad
    Abdul Latif Al-Khal
    Michael D Fetters
    BMC Medical Ethics, 15
  • [38] Procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating research participants in Qatar: findings from a qualitative investigation
    Killawi, Amal
    Khidir, Amal
    Elnashar, Maha
    Abdelrahim, Huda
    Hammoud, Maya
    Elliott, Heather
    Thurston, Michelle
    Asad, Humna
    Al-Khal, Abdul Latif
    Fetters, Michael D.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2014, 15
  • [39] REQUIREMENT FOR INFORMED CONSENT IN RESEARCH ON HUMAN SUBJECTS - PROBLEM OF UNCONTROLLED CONSEQUENCES OF HEALTH-RELATED RESEARCH
    MAKARUSHKA, JL
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1976, 24 (02): : 64 - 67
  • [40] Experiences and practices of key research team members in obtaining informed consent for pharmacogenetic research among people living with HIV: a qualitative study
    Sylvia, Nabukenya
    Joseph, Ochieng
    David, Kaawa-Mafigiri
    Ian, Munabi
    Janet, Nakigudde
    Nelson, Nakwagala Frederick
    John, Barugahare
    Betty, Kwagala
    Charles, Ibingira
    Adelline, Twimwijukye
    Nelson, Sewankambo
    Sabakaki, Mwaka Erisa
    RESEARCH ETHICS, 2022, 18 (03) : 193 - 209