Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical. Researchers-Part II. Statistical. Methods of Meta-Analysis

被引:237
作者
Lee, Juneyoung [1 ]
Kim, Kyung Won [2 ,3 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [2 ,3 ]
Huh, Jimi [2 ,3 ]
Park, Seong Ho [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biostat, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Res Inst Radiol, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Diagnostic test accuracy; CURVE;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies differs from the usual meta-analysis of therapeutic/interventional studies in that, it is required to simultaneously analyze a pair of two outcome measures such as sensitivity and specificity, instead of a single outcome. Since sensitivity and specificity are generally inversely correlated and could be affected by a threshold effect, more sophisticated statistical methods are required for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Hierarchical models including the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model are increasingly being accepted as standard methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. We provide a conceptual review of statistical methods currently used and recommended for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. This article could serve as a methodological reference for those who perform systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1188 / 1196
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ACAD RADIOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], ACAD RADIOL
[3]  
Bossuyt P.M., 2013, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
[4]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[5]   Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines [J].
Devillé W.L. ;
Buntinx F. ;
Bouter L.M. ;
Montori V.M. ;
De Vet H.C.W. ;
Van Der Windt D.A.W.M. ;
Bezemer P.D. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-13
[6]   A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy [J].
Dinnes, J ;
Deeks, J ;
Kirby, J ;
Roderick, P .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2005, 9 (12) :1-+
[7]   Evidence-based practice in radiology: Steps 3 and 4 appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature [J].
Dodd, Jonathan D. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 242 (02) :342-354
[8]  
Doebler P., Metaanalysis of diagnostic accuracy with mada
[9]   An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary [J].
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Whiting, Penny ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Shang, Aijing ;
Bachmann, Lucas M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (11) :1095-1103
[10]   A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies [J].
Harbord, Roger M. ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Whiting, Penny ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2007, 8 (02) :239-251