The status of implementation of the OECD guidelines for quality assurance in molecular genetic testing in the German speaking area

被引:0
作者
Lechner, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Hagleitner, Magdalena [3 ]
Staudinger, Bettina
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Sekt Humangenet, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Private Univ Gesundheitswissensch Med Informat &, UMIT, Hall In Tirol, Austria
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Sekt Hyg & Med Mikrobiol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
来源
LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE | 2013年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
genetic testing; human genetics; molecular genetics; OECD guidelines; proficiency testing; quality assurance; questionnaire;
D O I
10.1515/labmed-2012-0043
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The objective of this study was to collect and analyze data regarding how molecular genetics laboratories deal in practice with quality assurance, terms of quality and quality requirements shown in the literature. Methods: A 40 multipart question survey based on the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Molecular Genetic Testing 2007 was developed. Data from 144 molecular genetic testing laboratories (MGTLs) in German speaking areas were collected by a mail survey in September 2009 and analyzed with SPSS 15.0 and EXCEL. Results: In total, 144 MGTLs were contacted - 122 MGTLs in Germany, 13 MGTLs in Austria and nine MGTLs in Switzerland. A total of 48 MGTLs participated in the survey (total response rate=33.3%); however, nine of these MGTLs did not fill out the questionnaire owing to restructuring of their laboratory. The 39 responding laboratories reported that they provide four to 400 tests for disorders. Of the respondents, 64.1% indicated that they already have a quality system and 35.9% are in the planning process. Also, 54% of all responding laboratories issue reports of generally high quality, whereas 82.21% indicated that they participate in EMQN (European Molecular Genetics Quality Network) proficiency testing. All respondents required informed written consent prior to presymptomatic and predisposition testing, but six (15.4%) of the respondents declared that they offer prenatal diagnosis without obtaining written informed consent. Conclusions: This study revealed that a variety of stages exist in quality work. Clearly, the focus lies on output quality and integration of the OECD guidelines. The vast development in genetic testing methods indicates current and future challenges for practical quality work.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 121
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BUND GEN UNT BEIM ME
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Oslo Manual - Guidelines For Collecting And Interpreting Innovation Data, V3?me, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding, P1
[4]  
Casiman J-J., 2008, MED GENETIKI, V20, P18
[5]   Quality control in molecular genetic testing [J].
Dequeker, E ;
Ramsden, S ;
Grody, WW ;
Stenzel, TT ;
Barton, DE .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2001, 2 (09) :717-723
[6]  
Deutscher Bundestag, GEND DEUTSCHL GENDG
[7]  
Heid IM, 2005, GESUNDHEITSWESEN, V67, P5132
[8]   The new genetics - Genetic testing and public policy [J].
Holtzman, NA ;
Shapiro, D .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7134) :852-856
[9]   Discrepant DNA analysis in three patients with inherited arrhythmia: Molecular genetic test results deserve a second glance [J].
Honeywell, Christina R. ;
Gollob, Michael H. ;
Rutberg, Julie ;
Gow, Robert M. ;
Geraghty, Michael T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2008, 146A (11) :1466-1469
[10]   Genetic tests and their evaluation: Can we answer the key questions? [J].
Kroese, M ;
Zimmern, RL ;
Sanderson, S .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 6 (06) :475-480