Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study

被引:8
作者
Nomier, Alaa Shafiek [1 ]
Gaweesh, Yousria Salah El-Din [1 ]
Taalab, Maha R. R. [1 ]
El Sadat, Shaimaa Abu [2 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Med Periodontol Oral Diag & Oral Radiol, Champol St Azarita, Alexandria 21521, Egypt
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
CBCT; Dehiscence; Dental implants; Fenestration; Low-dose protocol; MAR; PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPHY; ALGORITHM; FENESTRATION; DEHISCENCE; MAGNITUDE; PROTOCOLS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-022-02663-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Early accurate radiographic assessment of peri-implant bone condition is highly important to avoid excessive loss of supporting bone and implant failure. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the radiographic technique of choice if peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration defects are suspected. The higher radiation dose and the presence of beam hardening artifacts are the main drawbacks of CBCT imaging techniques. This study aims to evaluate the influence of low-dose cone beam computed tomography (LD-CBCT) and metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the assessment of peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration. Methodology: Thirty titanium implants were inserted into bovine rib blocks. Twenty had standardized bone defects (10 with dehiscence and 10 with fenestration), while the remaining 10 were used as control group with no defects. Radiographic examinations held with high-definition CBCT (HD-CBCT) and LD-CBCT with and without application of MAR tool. Images were assessed by four examiners for the presence or absence of peri-implant defects. The area under the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for all radiographic protocols. Results: In the absence of MAR tool, there was no difference in AUC and diagnostic values between LD-CBCT and HD-CBCT for detection of both defects. When the MAR tool was applied, the AUC values, sensitivity, and accuracy were higher in HD-CBCT than in LD-CBCT for the detection of both defects, especially for the dehiscence, while specificity remained the same. Conclusion: LD-CBCT can be used in the evaluation of peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration without any decrease in diagnostic accuracy. The application of MAR tool decrease the diagnostic ability of both defects, especially for the detection of dehiscence defects.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Efficacy of low dose and ultra-low dose on the visibility of peri-implant fenestration and dehiscences: a computed tomography study [J].
Aktuna-Belgin, Ceren ;
Serindere, Gozde ;
Belgin, Huseyin Berkay ;
Serindere, Mehmet ;
Orhan, Kaan .
POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 87 :E24-E29
[2]  
Bagis N, 2022, ORAL RADIOL, V38, P325, DOI 10.1007/s11282-021-00561-3
[3]   Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm and an optimization filter in the estimation of peri-implant dehiscence defects by using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study [J].
Bayrak, Seval ;
Orhan, Kaan ;
Cakmak, Emine Sebnem Kursun ;
Gorurgoz, Cansu ;
Odabasi, Onur ;
Yilmaz, Dervis ;
Atakan, Cemal .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 130 (02) :209-216
[4]   Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: an in vitro study [J].
Bechara, B. B. ;
Moore, W. S. ;
McMahan, C. A. ;
Noujeim, M. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (03) :248-253
[5]   In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Sancho-Puchades, Manuel ;
Jung, Ronald E. ;
Deyhle, Hans ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (04) :378-383
[6]   Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review Focusing on Guidelines, Indications, and Radiation Dose Risks [J].
Bornstein, Michael M. ;
Scarfe, William C. ;
Vaughn, Vida M. ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 :55-77
[7]  
Cardarelli LL, 2021, INT J OPT PHOTONICS
[8]   STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration [J].
Cohen, Jeremie F. ;
Korevaar, Daniel A. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Bruns, David E. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine A. ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Irwig, Les ;
Levine, Deborah ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11)
[9]   A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects [J].
Dave, Meetal ;
Davies, Jonathan ;
Wilson, Ron ;
Palmer, Richard .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (06) :671-678
[10]   Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature [J].
De Vos, W. ;
Casselman, J. ;
Swennen, G. R. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (06) :609-625