Auto-G-Computation of Causal Effects on a Network

被引:41
作者
Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J. [1 ]
Fulcher, Isabel R. [2 ]
Shpitser, Ilya [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, 641 Hungtington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Whiting Sch Engn, Dept Comp Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Direct effect; Indirect effect; Interference; Network; Spillover effect; INTERFERENCE; INFERENCE; UNITS; IDENTIFICATION; PARTNERSHIPS; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1080/01621459.2020.1811098
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Methods for inferring average causal effects have traditionally relied on two key assumptions: (i) the intervention received by one unit cannot causally influence the outcome of another; and (ii) units can be organized into nonoverlapping groups such that outcomes of units in separate groups are independent. In this article, we develop new statistical methods for causal inference based on a single realization of a network of connected units for which neither assumption (i) nor (ii) holds. The proposed approach allows both for arbitrary forms of interference, whereby the outcome of a unit may depend on interventions received by other units with whom a network path through connected units exists; and long range dependence, whereby outcomes for any two units likewise connected by a path in the network may be dependent. Under network versions of consistency and no unobserved confounding, inference is made tractable by an assumption that the networks outcome, treatment and covariate vectors are a single realization of a certain chain graph model. This assumption allows inferences about various network causal effects via theauto-g-computation algorithm, a network generalization of Robins' well-known g-computation algorithm previously described for causal inference under assumptions (i) and (ii).for this article are available online.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 844
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   ESTIMATING AVERAGE CAUSAL EFFECTS UNDER GENERAL INTERFERENCE, WITH APPLICATION TO A SOCIAL NETWORK EXPERIMENT [J].
Aronow, Peter M. ;
Samii, Cyrus .
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2017, 11 (04) :1912-1947
[2]   A General Method for Detecting Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments [J].
Aronow, Peter M. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2012, 41 (01) :3-16
[3]   Exact p-Values for Network Interference [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Eckles, Dean ;
Imbens, Guido W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 113 (521) :230-240
[4]  
BESAG J, 1974, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V36, P192
[5]   Reasoning about Interference Between Units: A General Framework [J].
Bowers, Jake ;
Fredrickson, Mark M. ;
Panagopoulos, Costas .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 21 (01) :97-124
[6]   On colouring the nodes of a network [J].
Brooks, RL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1941, 37 :194-197
[7]  
Cox D., 1958, Planning of Experiments
[8]   gformula: Estimating causal effects in the presence of time-varying confounding or mediation using the g-computation formula [J].
Daniel, Rhian M. ;
De Stavola, Bianca L. ;
Cousens, Simon N. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (04) :479-517
[9]   EVIDENCE OF TREATMENT SPILLOVERS WITHIN MARKETS [J].
Ferracci, Marc ;
Jolivet, Gregory ;
van den Berg, Gerard J. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2014, 96 (05) :812-823
[10]   A Measure & Conquer Approach for the Analysis of Exact Algorithms [J].
Fomin, Fedor V. ;
Grandoni, Fabrizio ;
Kratsch, Dieter .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 2009, 56 (05)