Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and β-tricalcium phosphate.: A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs

被引:280
作者
Jensen, SS
Broggini, N
Hjorting-Hansen, E
Schenk, R
Buser, D
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Surg & Stomatol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
anorganic bovine bone; autograft; bone regeneration; bone substitute; experimental study; tricalcium phosphate;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01257.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose was to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the bone formation and graft resorption of two different bone substitutes used in both orthopedic and oral surgery, with autogenous bone as a positive control. Materials and methods: Three standardized bone defects were prepared in both mandibular angles of 12 adult minipigs. The defects were grafted with either autograft, anorganic bovine bone (ABB), or synthetic beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP). Sacrifice was performed after 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Results: At 2 weeks, more new bone formation was seen in defects filled with autograft than with ABB (P similar to 0.0005) and beta-TCP (P similar to 0.002). After 4 weeks, there was no significant difference between beta-TCP and the two other materials. Defects grafted with ABB still exhibited less bone formation as compared with autograft (P similar to 0.004). At 8 weeks, more bone formation was observed in defects grafted with autograft (P similar to 0.003) and beta-TCP (P similar to 0.00004) than with ABB. No difference could be demonstrated between beta-TCP and autograft. beta-TCP resorbed almost completely over 8 weeks, whereas ABB remained stable. Conclusion: Both bone substitutes seemed to decelerate bone regeneration in the early healing phase as compared with autograft. All defects ultimately regenerated with newly formed bone and a developing bone marrow. The grafting materials showed complete osseous integration. Both bone substitutes may have a place in reconstructive surgery where different clinical indications require differences in biodegradability.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Artzi Z, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P357
[2]  
Bohner M, 2000, Injury, V31 Suppl 4, P37
[3]  
BURCHARDT H, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P28
[4]   Evaluation of filling materials in membrane-protected bone defects - A comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs [J].
Buser, D ;
Hoffmann, B ;
Bernard, JP ;
Lussi, A ;
Mettler, D ;
Schenk, RK .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (03) :137-150
[5]  
EGGLI PS, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P127
[6]   Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus augmentation: analysis of interfacial bond strength of dental implants using pull-out tests [J].
Haas, R ;
Mailath, G ;
Dortbudak, O ;
Watzek, G .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (02) :117-122
[7]   The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants [J].
Hammerle, CHF ;
Chiantella, GC ;
Karring, T ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (03) :151-162
[8]   Bone grafting to the jaws with special reference to reconstructive preprosthetic surgery. A historical review. [J].
Hjørting-Hansen E. .
Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, 2002, 6 (1) :6-14
[9]  
Jensen S S, 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V11, P55
[10]  
Jensen SS, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V20, P703