Fertility control options for management of free-roaming horse populations

被引:0
|
作者
Bechert, Ursula S. [1 ]
Turner Jr, John W. [2 ]
Baker, Dan L. [3 ]
Eckery, Douglas C. [4 ]
Bruemmer, Jason E. [4 ]
Lyman, Candace C. [5 ]
Prado, Tulio M. [6 ]
King, Sarah R. B. [7 ]
Fraker, Mark A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Arts & Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, Toledo, OH 43614 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Anim Reprod & Biotechnol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] USDA APHIS WS, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
[5] Auburn Univ, Coll Vet Med, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[6] Univ Tennessee, Coll Vet Med, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[7] Colorado State Univ, Warner Coll Nat Resources, USGS Ft Collins Sci Ctr, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[8] SpayVac Wildlife Inc, Sidney, BC V8L 1M8, Canada
来源
HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS | 2022年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
castration; Equus asinus; Equus ferus; feral burros; feral horses; fertility control; field implementation; immunocontraception; intrauterine devices; ovariectomy; GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE; GROWTH-DIFFERENTIATION FACTOR-9; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN-15; PORCINE-ZONA-PELLUCIDA; WHITE-TAILED DEER; MARES FOLLOWING IMMUNOCONTRACEPTION; FERAL HORSES; WILD HORSES; EQUUS-CABALLUS; CONTRACEPTIVE VACCINE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The management of free-roaming horses (Equus ferus) and burros (E. asinus) in the United States has been referred to as a "wicked problem " because, although there are population control options, societal values will ultimately determine what is acceptable and what is not. In the United States, free-roaming equids are managed by different types of organizations and agencies, and the landscapes that these animals inhabit vary widely in terms of access, size, topography, climate, natural resources, flora, and fauna. This landscape diversity, coupled with contemporary socioeconomic and political environments, means that adaptive management practices are needed to regulate these free-roaming populations. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) currently manages free-roaming equids on 177 herd management areas in the United States by applying fertility control measures in situ and/or removing horses, which are either adopted by private individuals or sent to long-term holding facilities. The BLM off-range population currently includes > 50,000 animals and costs approximately $50 million USD per year to maintain; on-range equid numbers were estimated in March 2022 to be approximately 82,384. On-range populations can grow at 15-20% annually, and current estimates far exceed the designated appropriate management level of 26,715. To reduce population recruitment, managers need better information about effective, long-lasting or permanent fertility control measures. Because mares breed only once a year, fertility control studies take years to complete. Some contraceptive approaches have been studied for decades, and results from various trials can collectively inform future research directions and actions. Employing 1 or more fertility control tools in concert with removals offers the best potential for success. Active, iterative, cooperative, and thoughtful management practices can protect free-roaming horses while simultaneously protecting the habitat. Herein, we review contraceptive vaccines, intrauterine devices, and surgical sterilization options for controlling fertility of free-roaming horses. This review provides managers with a "fertility control toolbox " and guides future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 38
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fertility control options for management of free-roaming horse populations
    Bechert, Ursula S.
    Turner, John W.
    Baker, Dan L.
    Eckery, Douglas C.
    Bruemmer, Jason E.
    Lyman, Candace C.
    Prado, Tulio M.
    King, Sarah R. B.
    Fraker, Mark A.
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2022, 16 (02) : 179 - 216
  • [2] PopEquus: A predictive modeling tool to support management decisions for free-roaming horse populations
    Folt, Brian
    Schoenecker, Kathryn A.
    Ekernas, L. Stefan
    Edmunds, David R.
    Hannon, Mark
    ECOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (09):
  • [3] Nonsurgical fertility control for managing free-roaming dog populations: A review of products and criteria for field applications
    Massei, Giovanna
    Miller, Lowell A.
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2013, 80 (08) : 829 - 838
  • [4] Fertility control for managing free-roaming feral cattle in Hong Kong
    Massei, Giovanna
    Koon, Ka-Kei
    Law, Siu-Iun
    Gomm, Matt
    Mora, Darcy S. O.
    Callaby, Rebecca
    Palphramand, Kate
    Eckery, Douglas C.
    VACCINE, 2018, 36 (48) : 7393 - 7398
  • [5] Free-roaming dog populations: A cost-benefit model for different management options, applied to Abruzzo, Italy
    Hogasen, H. R.
    Er, C.
    Di Nardo, A.
    Dalla Villa, P.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2013, 112 (3-4) : 401 - 413
  • [6] The demography of free-roaming dog populations and applications to disease and population control
    Morters, Michelle K.
    McKinley, Trevelyan J.
    Restif, Olivier
    Conlan, Andrew J. K.
    Cleaveland, Sarah
    Hampson, Katie
    Whay, Helen R.
    Damriyasa, I. Made
    Wood, James L. N.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2014, 51 (04) : 1096 - 1106
  • [7] Simulating Free-Roaming Cat Population Management Options in Open Demographic Environments
    Miller, Philip S.
    Boone, John D.
    Briggs, Joyce R.
    Lawler, Dennis F.
    Levy, Julie K.
    Nutter, Felicia B.
    Slater, Margaret
    Zawistowski, Stephen
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [8] Multi-objective modeling as a decision- support tool for free-roaming horse management
    Folt, Brian
    Schoenecker, Kathryn A.
    Ekernas, L. Stefan
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2022, 16 (02) : 233 - 250
  • [9] Free-Roaming Interpretations
    Lugo, Alejandro
    NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW, 2022, 127 : 5 - 5
  • [10] Free-roaming cats
    Milne, Emma Goodman
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2019, 185 (14) : 447 - 447