Correlation Between HER2 Determined by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction of the Oncotype DX Test

被引:19
作者
Dvorak, Leah [1 ]
Dolan, Michelle [1 ]
Fink, James
Varghese, Linda [3 ]
Henriksen, Jonathan [1 ]
Gulbahce, H. Evin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Fairview, MN USA
[2] VA Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Fairview Southdale Hosp, Edina, MN USA
关键词
HER2; FISH; RT-PCR; GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS; GENETIC-HETEROGENEITY; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; BREAST;
D O I
10.1097/PAI.0b013e3182632ff5
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene is amplified and its protein product overexpressed in about 20% of invasive breast cancers. Despite more than a decade of efforts to standardize HER2 testing, controversy persists regarding the most optimal testing method. Recently, Oncotype DX reports have begun including HER2 results in addition to the previously reported Recurrence Score. We compared HER2 results obtained by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in our laboratories with HER2 results obtained by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as documented in the Oncotype DX report. We then sought to identify potentially significant characteristics in the discrepant cases. We identified breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-positive, lymph node-negative tumors who had Oncotype DX testing performed between September 2008 and March 2012. Patient and tumor characteristics including HER2 FISH and Oncotype DX test results were recorded. Image analysis was performed on cases with discrepancy between the HER2 FISH and Oncotype DX HER2 results to determine the relative proportion of invasive tumor. Eight of 194 (4.1%) cases showed discrepancy between HER2 FISH and Oncotype DX RT-PCR results. Although the overall percent agreement (96%) and percent negative agreement (100%) were high, percent positive agreement was only 50%. Three of 8 (38%) discrepant cases showed heterogeneous amplification by FISH. Seven of 8 (88%) discrepant cases had < 50% invasive tumor in the Oncotype DX tissue block. Percent positive agreement between HER2 FISH and Oncotype DX RT-PCR is low. Multiple factors may contribute to this discrepancy including a suboptimal microdissection and possibly heterogeneous amplification of HER2 gene in some cases.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 199
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Assessment in a Case-Control Study: Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Performed by Central Laboratories [J].
Baehner, Frederick L. ;
Achacoso, Ninah ;
Maddala, Tara ;
Shak, Steve ;
Quesenberry, Charles P., Jr. ;
Goldstein, Lynn C. ;
Gown, Allen M. ;
Habel, Laurel A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (28) :4300-4306
[2]   Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Overexpression As a Prognostic Factor in a Large Tissue Microarray Series of Node-Negative Breast Cancers [J].
Chia, Stephen ;
Norris, Brian ;
Speers, Caroline ;
Cheang, Maggie ;
Gilks, Blake ;
Gown, Allen M. ;
Huntsman, David ;
Olivotto, Ivo A. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Gelmon, Karen .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (35) :5697-5704
[3]   Measurement of gene expression in archival paraffin-embedded tissues - Development and performance of a 92-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay [J].
Cronin, M ;
Pho, M ;
Dutta, D ;
Stephans, JC ;
Shak, S ;
Kiefer, MC ;
Esteban, JM ;
Baker, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2004, 164 (01) :35-42
[4]   High False- Negative Rate of HER2 Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction of the Oncotype DX Test: An Independent Quality Assurance Study [J].
Dabbs, David J. ;
Klein, Molly E. ;
Mohsin, Syed K. ;
Tubbs, Raymond R. ;
Shuai, Yongli ;
Bhargava, Rohit .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (32) :4279-4285
[5]   Real-time quantitative PCR of microdissected paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma -: An alternative method for HER-2/neu analysis [J].
Gjerdrum, LM ;
Sorensen, BS ;
Kjeldsen, E ;
Sorensen, FB ;
Nexo, E ;
Hamilton-Dutoit, S .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2004, 6 (01) :42-51
[6]  
Hsu CY, 2010, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V134, P162, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165-134.2.162.a
[7]  
Middleton LP, 2009, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V133, P775, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165-133.5.775
[8]  
Mohsin SK, 2010, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V134, P660, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165-134.5.660
[9]  
Vance GH, 2009, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V133, P611, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165-133.4.611
[10]   American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer [J].
Wolff, Antonio C. ;
Hammond, M. Elizabeth H. ;
Schwartz, Jared N. ;
Hagerty, Karen L. ;
Allred, D. Craig ;
Cote, Richard J. ;
Dowsett, Mitchell ;
Fitzgibbons, Patrick L. ;
Hanna, Wedad M. ;
Langer, Amy ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Paik, Soonmyung ;
Pegram, Mark D. ;
Perez, Edith A. ;
Press, Michael F. ;
Rhodes, Anthony ;
Sturgeon, Catharine ;
Taube, Sheila E. ;
Tubbs, Raymond ;
Vance, Gail H. ;
de Vijver, Marc Van ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Hayes, Daniel F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (01) :118-145