Role of Colonoscopy and Polyp Characteristics in Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopic Polyp Detection A Population-Based Case-Control Study

被引:63
作者
Brenner, Hermann [1 ]
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Jansen, Lina
Seiler, Christoph M.
Hoffmeister, Michael
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol & Aging Res, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
SURVEILLANCE COLONOSCOPY; ADENOMA CHARACTERISTICS; SCREENING COLONOSCOPY; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE; PREDICTORS; PROTECTION; NEOPLASMS; HISTORY;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies have identified characteristics of adenomas detected on colonoscopy to be predictive of adenoma recurrence. Objective: To assess the role of both colonoscopy-related factors and polyp characteristics on the risk for colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection. Design: Population-based case-control study (3148 case participants and 3274 control participants). Setting: Rhine-Neckar region of Germany. Patients: Case and control participants with physician-validated detection of polyps (other than hyperplastic polyps) at a previous colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Measurements: Detailed history and results of previous colonoscopies were obtained through interviews and medical records. Case and control participants were compared according to colonoscopy-related factors (incompleteness, poor bowel preparation, incomplete removal of all polyps, and no surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years) and polyp characteristics (>= 1 cm, villous components or high-grade dysplasia, >= 3 polyps, and >= 1 proximal polyp). Odds ratios (ORs) and attributable fractions were derived by using multiple logistic regression and the Levin formula. Results: 155 case participants and 260 control participants with physician-validated polyp detection in the past 10 years were identified. The following characteristics were significantly more common among case participants than among control participants: not all polyps completely removed (29.0% vs. 9.6%; OR, 3.73 [95% CI, 2.11 to 6.60]), no surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years (26.5% vs. 11.5%; OR, 2.96 [CI, 1.70 to 5.16]), and detection of 3 or more polyps (14.2% vs. 7.3%; OR, 2.21 [CI, 1.07 to 4.54]). Odds ratios ranged from 1.12 to 1.42 and CIs included 1.00 for all other variables. Overall, 41.1% and 21.7% of cancer cases were statistically attributable to colonoscopy-related factors and polyp characteristics, respectively. Limitation: This was an observational study with potential for residual confounding and selection bias. Conclusion: Colonoscopy-related factors are more important than polyp characteristics for stratification of colorectal cancer risk after colonoscopic polyp detection in the community setting.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 233
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy [J].
Avidan, B ;
Sonnenberg, A ;
Schnell, TG ;
Leya, J ;
Metz, A ;
Sontag, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (06) :1524-1529
[2]   Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients [J].
Bertario, L ;
Russo, A ;
Sala, P ;
Pizzetti, P ;
Ballardini, G ;
Andreola, S ;
Spinelli, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 105 (01) :82-87
[3]   Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence [J].
Bonithon-Kopp, C ;
Piard, F ;
Fenger, C ;
Cabeza, E ;
O'Morain, C ;
Kronborg, O ;
Faivre, J .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (03) :323-333
[4]   Long-Term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Negative Colonoscopy [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Seiler, Christoph M. ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (28) :3761-3767
[5]   Protection From Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy A Population-Based, Case-Control Study [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Seiler, Christoph M. ;
Rickert, Alexander ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (01) :22-U156
[6]   Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities: Effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up [J].
Cafferty, Fay H. ;
Wong, Jau-Min ;
Yen, Amy Ming-Fang ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Atkin, Wendy S. ;
Chen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (04) :263-270
[7]   Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Calonge, Ned ;
Petitti, Diana B. ;
DeWitt, Thomas G. ;
Dietrich, Allen J. ;
Gregory, Kimberly D. ;
Harris, Russell ;
Isham, George ;
LeFevre, Michael L. ;
Leipzig, Roseanne M. ;
Loveland-Cherry, Carol ;
Marion, Lucy N. ;
Melnyk, Bernadette ;
Moyer, Virginia A. ;
Ockene, Judith K. ;
Sawaya, George F. ;
Yawn, Barbara P. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (09) :627-+
[8]   Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy [J].
Imperiale, Thomas F. ;
Glowinski, Elizabeth A. ;
Lin-Cooper, Ching ;
Larkin, Gregory N. ;
Rogge, James D. ;
Ransohoff, David F. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (12) :1218-1224
[9]   Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer [J].
Kaminski, Michal F. ;
Regula, Jaroslaw ;
Kraszewska, Ewa ;
Polkowski, Marcin ;
Wojciechowska, Urszula ;
Didkowska, Joanna ;
Zwierko, Maria ;
Rupinski, Maciej ;
Nowacki, Marek P. ;
Butruk, Eugeniusz .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (19) :1795-1803
[10]   Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: Predictive accuracy for advanced adenorna at 4 years [J].
Laiyemo, Adeyinka O. ;
Murphy, Gwen ;
Albert, Paul S. ;
Wang, Zhuoqiao ;
Cross, Amanda J. ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Caan, Bette ;
Marshall, James R. ;
Lance, Peter ;
Paskett, Electra D. ;
Weissfeld, Joel ;
Slattery, Martha L. ;
Burt, Randall ;
Iber, Frank ;
Shike, Moshe ;
Kikendall, J. Walter ;
Lanza, Elaine ;
Schatzkin, Arthur .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (06) :419-426