The clinical impact and risk factors of latent pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

被引:9
作者
Ohgi, Katsuhisa [1 ]
Yamamoto, Yusuke [1 ]
Sugiura, Teiichi [1 ]
Okamura, Yukiyasu [1 ]
Ito, Takaaki [1 ]
Ashida, Ryo [1 ]
Uesaka, Katsuhiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Div Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka 4118777, Japan
关键词
body mass index; C-reactive protein; pancreatic fistula; pancreatoduodenectomy; portal vein; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; FATTY PANCREAS; HEAD RESECTION; DRAIN REMOVAL; SURGERY; FLUID; DEFINITION; MANAGEMENT; AMYLASE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/jhbp.820
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Latent pancreatic fistula (LPF) is difficult to diagnose during the early postoperative phase because of initially normal drain fluid amylase (DFA) levels. The present study investigated the clinical significance and risk factors of LPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods A total of 662 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. LPF was defined as pancreatic fistula that developed later regardless of initially low DFA levels. Results Among the 372 patients with DFA <= 375 U/L (three times the upper limit for serum) on postoperative day (POD) 3, LPF occurred in 37 (10%). The rates of postoperative hemorrhaging (11% vs 1.5%), intraabdominal abscess (57% vs 7.2%) and reintervention (46% vs 2.7%) were significantly higher in the patients with LPF than in those without LPF. A multivariate analysis revealed that a body mass index >= 25 kg/m(2), a non-combined portal vein resection, a DFA on POD 1 >= 650 U/L and a C-reactive protein level on POD 3 >= 11 mg/dL were independent risk factors for LPF. Conclusions Latent pancreatic fistula was significantly associated with severe complications and worse outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. Early drain removal may be unfavorable for patients with some of these risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1010
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Pancreatic resection: Drain or no drain?
    Adham, Mustapha
    Chopin-Laly, Xavier
    Lepilliez, Vincent
    Gincul, Rodica
    Valette, Pierre-Jean
    Ponchon, Thierry
    [J]. SURGERY, 2013, 154 (05) : 1069 - 1077
  • [2] The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After
    Bassi, Claudio
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Dervenis, Christos
    Sarr, Micheal
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Adham, Mustapha
    Allen, Peter
    Andersson, Roland
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Conlon, Kevin
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Falconi, Massimo
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos
    Fingerhut, Abe
    Friess, Helmut
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Izbicki, Jakob
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Olah, Attila
    Schulick, Richard
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    Takada, Tadahiro
    Takaori, Kyoichi
    Traverso, William
    Vollmer, Charles
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Salvia, Roberto
    Buehler, Marcus
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [3] Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Bassi, Claudio
    Molinari, Enrico
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Crippa, Stefano
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Salvia, Roberto
    Talamini, Giorgio
    Pederzoli, Paolo
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [4] A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy
    Callery, Mark P.
    Pratt, Wande B.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Chaikof, Elliot L.
    Vollmer, Charles M., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [5] Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy
    de Castro, SMM
    Busch, ORC
    van Gulik, TM
    Obertop, H
    Gouma, DJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (09) : 1117 - 1123
  • [6] Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery - A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
    DeOliveira, Michelle L.
    Winter, Jordan M.
    Schafer, Markus
    Cunningham, Steven C.
    Cameron, John L.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (06) : 931 - 939
  • [7] Early Drain Removal-The Middle Ground Between the Drain Versus No Drain Debate in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy A Prospective Validation Study
    Fong, Zhi Ven
    Correa-Gallego, Camilo
    Ferrone, Cristina R.
    Veillette, Gregory R.
    Warshaw, Andrew L.
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 378 - 383
  • [8] Modified Blumgart Anastomosis for Pancreaticojejunostomy: Technical Improvement in Matched Historical Control Study
    Fujii, Tsutomu
    Sugimoto, Hiroyuki
    Yamada, Suguru
    Kanda, Mitsuro
    Suenaga, Masaya
    Takami, Hideki
    Hattori, Masashi
    Inokawa, Yoshikuni
    Nomoto, Shuji
    Fujiwara, Michitaka
    Kodera, Yasuhiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (06) : 1108 - 1115
  • [9] Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Gaujoux, Sebastien
    Cortes, Alexandre
    Couvelard, Anne
    Noullet, Severine
    Clavel, Laurent
    Rebours, Vinciane
    Levy, Philippe
    Sauvanet, Alain
    Ruszniewski, Philippe
    Belghiti, Jacques
    [J]. SURGERY, 2010, 148 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [10] Kakita A, 2001, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, V8, P230, DOI 10.1007/s005340170022