Decision Making Framework for Photovoltaic Cell Technologies Using Six Sigma

被引:0
|
作者
Mazumdar, Poornima [1 ]
Krishnamoorthy, Harish S. [1 ]
Manickam, Ilaval [1 ]
Balog, Robert S. [1 ]
Enjeti, Prasad N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, ECE Dept, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
来源
2012 38TH IEEE PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PVSC) | 2012年
关键词
Six sigma; decision making; photovoltaic systems; cell technology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The fast pace of technology and business innovation in the renewable energy sector can make it difficult to thoroughly evaluate competing technologies, often because incontrovertible data is lacking or obscured by speculation, hype, and vaporware claims. Thus an impartial and comprehensive tool is needed to analyze qualitative and subjective parameters. This paper proposes the use of Six Sigma as a quantitative method suitable for evaluating emerging technologies in the solar and other renewable energy markets and will demonstrate how the Six Sigma tools of the Fishbone Diagram, Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Priority Matrix can be applied to analyze photovoltaic cell technologies. Market data is shown to confirm the results of the Six Sigma analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:2449 / 2454
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision Making Framework for Solar Photovoltaic Power Conditioning Unit Topologies Using Six Sigma
    Krishnamoorthy, Harish S.
    Mazumdar, Poornima
    Manickam, Ilaval
    Balog, Robert S.
    Enjeti, Prasad N.
    2012 38TH IEEE PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PVSC), 2012, : 1352 - 1356
  • [2] A conceptual framework for integrating six-sigma and strategic management methodologies to quantify decision making
    School of Business and Industry, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, United States
    TQM Mag., 2007, 6 (561-571): : 561 - 571
  • [3] Six Sigma project selection using fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making method
    Wei, Chun-Chin
    Cheng, Yung-Lung
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2020, 31 (11-12) : 1266 - 1289
  • [4] A Bayesian approach for multiple criteria decision making with applications in Design for Six Sigma
    Rajagopal, R.
    del Castillo, E.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2007, 58 (06) : 779 - 790
  • [5] A Decision Analysis View of Six Sigma
    Al Kindi, Mahmood
    Abbas, Ali E.
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, 2010, : 389 - 393
  • [6] A framework for effective Six Sigma implementation
    Jones, Erick C.
    Parast, Mahour Mellat
    Adams, Stephanie G.
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2010, 21 (04) : 415 - 424
  • [7] Using Logic Concepts on Six Sigma
    Kirilo, Caique Z.
    Abe, Jair M.
    Lozano, Luiz
    Parreira, Renato H.
    Dacorso, Eduardo P.
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: INITIATIVES FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2016, 488 : 36 - 42
  • [8] Design of a systematic framework for deploying SLA using six sigma methodology
    Choi, JY
    7th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, Vols 1 and 2, Proceedings, 2005, : 697 - 700
  • [9] Framework for prioritizing and allocating six sigma projects using fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy expert system
    Jafarian, A.
    Nikabadi, M. Shafiei
    Amiri, M.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2014, 21 (06) : 2281 - 2294
  • [10] Improving Decision Making Using Semantic Web Technologies
    Chhetri, Tek Raj
    SEMANTIC WEB: ESWC 2021 SATELLITE EVENTS, 2021, 12739 : 165 - 175