Meta-analysis of the success of block following combined spinal-epidural vs epidural analgesia during labour

被引:56
作者
Heesen, M. [1 ]
Van de Velde, M. [2 ]
Kloehr, S. [1 ]
Lehberger, J. [1 ]
Rossaint, R. [3 ]
Straube, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Bamberg, Dept Anaesthesiol, Bamberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Anaesthesiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Aachen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Aachen, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Occupat Social & Environm Med, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DURAL PUNCTURE; PARTURIENTS; SUFENTANIL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1111/anae.12456
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Observational studies suggest that combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSE) is associated with more reliable positioning, lower epidural catheter replacement rates, and a lower incidence of unilateral block compared with epidural analgesia. However, evidence from high-quality trials still needs to be assessed systematically. We performed a systematic review that included 10 randomised controlled trials comparing CSE and epidural analgesia in 1722 labouring women in labour. The relative risk of unilateral block was significantly reduced after CSE vs epidural analgesia (0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.97), but significant between-study heterogeneity was present (I-2=69%, p=0.01). No differences were found for rates of epidural catheter replacement, epidural top-up, and epidural vein cannulation. On the basis of current best evidence, a consistent benefit of CSE over epidural analgesia cannot be demonstrated for the outcomes assessed in our review. A large randomised controlled trial with adequate power is required.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 71
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [2] A Randomized Trial of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Compared with the Standard Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia
    Cappiello, Eric
    O'Rourke, Nollag
    Segal, Scott
    Tsen, Lawrence C.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (05) : 1646 - 1651
  • [3] Choi PT, 2003, CAN J ANAESTH, V50, P460, DOI 10.1007/BF03021057
  • [4] Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia
    Dunn, SM
    Connelly, NR
    Steinberg, RB
    Lewis, TJ
    Bazzell, CM
    Klatt, JL
    Parker, RK
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (02) : 331 - 335
  • [5] Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: A retrospective chart review
    Eappen, S
    Blinn, A
    Segal, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1998, 7 (04) : 220 - 225
  • [6] Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in obstetrics
    Eisenach, JC
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (01) : 299 - 302
  • [7] A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Epidural Analgesia and Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia in a Private Practice Setting: Pain Scores During First and Second Stages of Labor and at Delivery
    Gambling, David
    Berkowitz, Jonathan
    Farrell, Thomas R.
    Pue, Alex
    Shay, Dennis
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 116 (03) : 636 - 643
  • [8] A Randomized Trial of Breakthrough Pain During Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Epidural Labor Analgesia in Parous Women
    Goodman, Stephanie R.
    Smiley, Richard M.
    Negron, Maria A.
    Freedman, Paula A.
    Landau, Ruth
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (01) : 246 - 251
  • [9] Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia
    Hepner, DL
    Gaiser, RR
    Cheek, TG
    Gutsche, BB
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (03): : 232 - 236
  • [10] Comparison of epidural analgesia with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: a retrospective study of 6497 cases
    Miro, M.
    Guasch, E.
    Gilsanz, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 17 (01) : 15 - 19