Behavioural and ERP correlates of bilingual language control and general-purpose inhibitory control predicted by L1 and L2 proficiency

被引:7
作者
Dash, Tanya [1 ]
Kar, Bhoomika R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Allahabad, Ctr Behav & Cognit Sci, Allahabad 211002, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Bilingualism; Inhibitory control; Bilingual language control; General-purpose cognitive control; Language proficiency; Event-related potential; Negative priming paradigm; POSITIVE PRIMING DISAPPEARS; CONFLICT-RESOLUTION; SPANISH-ENGLISH; TASK; REPRESENTATION; INTERFERENCE; MONOLINGUALS; ADVANTAGE; WORDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100914
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Cognitive control is the ability to adapt flexibly to current demands by promoting task-relevant information in the face of interference, and this has been asserted as an advantage with bilinguals. Bilingual language control and general-purpose cognitive control are discussed in the literature using different types of stimuli, cognitive tasks, component processes (selection, interference, inhibition, switching) and groups (bilingual vs. monolingual; high proficient vs. low proficient bilingual). The present study was designed to investigate the neurocognitive correlates of inhibitory control with linguistic (i.e., words) and nonlinguistic (i.e., line drawings of objects) stimuli in Hindi-English bilingual adults. We conducted the behavioural experiment first to establish the linguistic version of identity negative priming paradigm followed by the Event-related potential (ERP) experiment using the linguistic and nonlinguistic negative priming task. Results show the presence of inhibition effect using mean reaction times as well as ERP data while comparing the control and ignored repetition conditions, and this pattern varied with different stimuli - linguistic vs. nonlinguistic. Thus, the current study suggests that bilingual language control is not entirely subsidiary to general-purpose cognitive control and shows differences based on the stimulus type. Also, proficiency in L1 and L2 differentially predicts performance on the nonlinguistic and linguistic negative priming paradigm, respectively. These results are indicative of a dynamic cognitive control system associated with bilingualism, which varies as a function of stimulus type as well as language proficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Abbate M.S., 1984, PICTURES PLEASE LANG
  • [2] Language control and lexical competition in bilinguals: An event-related fMRI study
    Abutalebi, Jubin
    Annoni, Jean-Marie
    Zimine, Ivan
    Pegna, Alan J.
    Seghier, Mohamed L.
    Lee-Jahnke, Hannelore
    Lazeyras, Francois
    Cappa, Stefano F.
    Khateb, Asaid
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2008, 18 (07) : 1496 - 1505
  • [3] Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control
    Abutalebi, Jubin
    Green, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2007, 20 (03) : 242 - 275
  • [4] Bilingualism Tunes the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Conflict Monitoring
    Abutalebi, Jubin
    Della Rosa, Pasquale Anthony
    Green, David W.
    Hernandez, Mireia
    Scifo, Paola
    Keim, Roland
    Cappa, Stefano F.
    Costa, Albert
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2012, 22 (09) : 2076 - 2086
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2001, BILINGUALISM DEV LAN, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09780511605963
  • [6] Language dominance predicts cognate effects and inhibitory control in young adult bilinguals
    Anthony, Jonathan J. D. Robinson
    Blumenfeld, Henrike K.
    [J]. BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2019, 22 (05) : 1068 - 1084
  • [7] Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task
    Bialystok, E
    Craik, FIM
    Klein, R
    Viswanathan, M
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2004, 19 (02) : 290 - 303
  • [8] Bialystok E., 2009, CHALLENGES LANGUAGE
  • [9] Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain
    Bialystok, Ellen
    Craik, Fergus I. M.
    Luk, Gigi
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (04) : 240 - 250
  • [10] Bialystok Ellen, 2009, Psychol Sci Public Interest, V10, P89, DOI 10.1177/1529100610387084