Association between Ras association domain family 1A promoter methylation and hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Zhao, Ze-Hua [1 ]
Fan, Yu-Chen [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yang [1 ]
Wang, Kai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Hepatol, Qilu Hosp, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Inst Hepatol, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Methylation; Ras association domain family 1A; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Biomarker; Diagnostic sensitivity; Diagnostic specificity; DNA METHYLATION; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; LIVER-DISEASE; CANCER; BIOMARKERS; PLASMA; GENES; RASSF1A; TISSUE; TESTS;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7189
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To assess diagnostic accuracy of Ras association domain family 1A (RASSF1A) promoter methylation in body fluids (serum, plasma and whole blood) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Relative information about study characteristics and incidence of RASSF1A methylation was collected. Quality of all included studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a random-effect model, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to demonstrate the overall diagnostic performance. Positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95%CI were also calculated. Meta-regression was applied to analyze observed heterogeneity, and Deeks' test was performed to detect publication bias. RESULTS: After a systematic literature review, seven studies with a total of 302 cases of HCC and 250 cases of chronic liver diseases were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.49-0.85) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54-0.85), respectively. The PLR was 2.51 (95% CI: 1.64-3.86), NLR was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.25-0.68), and DOR was 6.13 (95% CI: 3.17-11.84). The chi(2) values of sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 59.41 (P<0.001), 50.50 (P<0.001), 17.40 (P=0.010), 31.24 (P<0.001) and 80.51 (P<0.001), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81). Three factors were analyzed by univariate meta-regression and none was significant to interpret the observed heterogeneity (P>0.05). No significant publication bias was detected by Deeks' test (P=0.346). CONCLUSION: We showed the potential diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation in body fluids in HCC patients and it may improve diagnostic accuracy combined with the a-fetoprotein test. (C) 2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7189 / 7196
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The association between CDH1 promoter methylation and patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic meta-analysis
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Bing
    Zhang, Yun-mei
    Wang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2016, 9
  • [22] RUNX3 Promoter Methylation Is Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xueyan
    He, Hairong
    Zhang, Xu
    Guo, Wenjie
    Wang, Yueqi
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2015, 33 (04) : 121 - 125
  • [23] Association between GPX3 promoter methylation and malignant tumors: A meta-analysis
    Zhou, Cong
    Hu, Haochang
    Zheng, Zhonghua
    Chen, Chujia
    Li, Yin
    Li, Bin
    Duan, Shiwei
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 215 (07)
  • [24] Adenomatous polyposis coli and Ras association domain family 1A gene methylation in breast cancer patients
    Park, Il-kyung
    Yim, Jee-Soo
    Ra, Yu-Mi
    Ko, Dae-gyung
    Choi, In-seok
    Choi, Won-jun
    Yoon, Dae-sung
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2007, 10 (02) : 120 - 126
  • [25] Association of RASSF1A Promoter Methylation with Lung Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis
    Huang, Ying-Ze
    Wu, Wei
    Wu, Kun
    Xu, Xiao-Ning
    Tang, Wen-Ru
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (23) : 10325 - 10328
  • [26] Association of RASSF1A promoter methylation with gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis
    Shi, Dong-Tao
    Han, Mei
    Gao, Nan
    Tian, Wenyan
    Chen, Weichang
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (02) : 943 - 948
  • [27] Aberrant promoter methylation of SOCS-1 gene may contribute to the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Zhao, Rong-Ce
    Zhou, Jing
    He, Jing-Yang
    Wei, Yong-Gang
    Qin, Yang
    Li, Bo
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2016, 21 (01): : 142 - 151
  • [28] CpG island promoter hypermethylation of Ras association domain family 1A gene contributes to gastric carcinogenesis
    Joo, Moon Kyung
    Kim, Key Hyeon
    Park, Jong-Jae
    Yoo, Hyo Soon
    Choe, Jungwan
    Kim, Hyo Jung
    Lee, Beom Jae
    Kim, Jae Seon
    Bak, Young-Tae
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2015, 11 (04) : 3039 - 3046
  • [29] Association Between hMLH1 Promoter Methylation and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Ye, Peng
    Shi, Yu
    Li, Anling
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [30] Meta-analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Zhang, Cheng
    Li, Jinyun
    Huang, Tao
    Duan, Shiwei
    Dai, Dongjun
    Jiang, Danjie
    Sui, Xinbing
    Li, Da
    Chen, Yidan
    Ding, Fei
    Huang, Changxin
    Chen, Gongying
    Wang, Kaifeng
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (49) : 81255 - 81267