Footprint and detectability of a well leaking CO2 in the Central North Sea: Implications from a field experiment and numerical modelling

被引:36
作者
Vielstaedte, Lisa [1 ]
Linke, Peter [1 ]
Schmidt, Mark [1 ]
Sommer, Stefan [1 ]
Haeckel, Matthias [1 ]
Braack, Malte [2 ]
Wallmann, Klaus [1 ]
机构
[1] GEOMAR Helmholtz Ctr Ocean Res Kiel, Wischhofstr 1-3, D-24148 Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Dept Appl Math, Kiel, Germany
关键词
Carbon dioxide; Geological storage; Leakage; North Sea; Sleipner; Wells; GEOLOGICAL RESERVOIRS; BUBBLE PLUMES; FLUID-FLOW; OIL-WELL; LEAKAGE; METHANE; STORAGE; SLEIPNER; CEMENT; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.03.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Existing wells pose a risk for the loss of carbon dioxide (CO2) from storage sites, which might compromise the suitability of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies as climate change mitigation options. Here, we show results of a controlled CO2 release experiment at the Sleipner CO2 storage site and numerical simulations that evaluate the detectability and environmental consequences of a well leaking CO2 into the Central North Sea (CNS). Our field measurements and numerical results demonstrate that the detectability and impact of a leakage of < 55 t yr(-1) of CO2 would be limited to bottom waters and a small area around the leak, due to rapid CO2 bubble dissolution in seawater within the lower 2 m of the water column and quick dispersion of the dissolved CO2 plume by strong tidal currents. As such, the consequences of a single well leaking CO2 are found to be insignificant in terms of storage performance. Only prolonged leakage along numerous wells might compromise long-term CO2 storage and may adversely affect the local marine ecosystem. Since many abandoned wells leak natural gas into the marine environment, hydrocarbon provinces with a high density of wells may not always be the most suitable areas for CO2 storage.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 203
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J LARGE SCALE RES FA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PREPARED WORKING GRO
[3]  
Arts R., 2008, First break, V26, P65, DOI DOI 10.3997/1365-2397.26.1115.27807
[4]   Detection of CO2 leakage from a simulated sub-seabed storage site using three different types of pCO2 sensors [J].
Atamanchuk, Dariia ;
Tengberg, Anders ;
Aleynik, Dmitry ;
Fietzek, Peer ;
Shitashima, Kiminori ;
Lichtschlag, Anna ;
Hall, Per O. J. ;
Stahl, Henrik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 38 :121-134
[5]   Review of failures for wells used for CO2 and acid gas injection in Alberta, Canada [J].
Bachu, Stefan ;
Watson, Theresa L. .
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01) :3531-3537
[6]  
Blackford J, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1011, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2381, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2381]
[7]  
Boudreau B.P., 1997, DIAGENETIC MODELS TH, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-60421-8
[8]   Assessment of the processes controlling seasonal variations of dissolved inorganic carbon in the North Sea [J].
Bozec, Yann ;
Thomas, Helmuth ;
Schiettecatte, Laure-Sophie ;
Borges, Alberto V. ;
Elkalay, Khalid ;
de Baar, Hein J. W. .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2006, 51 (06) :2746-2762
[9]  
Brufatto C., 2003, Oilfield Review, P62
[10]   Analysis and performance of oil well cement with 30 years Of CO2 exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA [J].
Carey, J. William ;
Wigand, Marcus ;
Chipera, Steve J. ;
WoldeGabriel, Giday ;
Pawar, Rajesh ;
Lichtner, Peter C. ;
Wehner, Scott C. ;
Raines, Michael A. ;
Guthrie, George D., Jr. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (01) :75-85