Cross-cultural claims on Devils Tower National Monument: a case study

被引:14
作者
Dustin, DL
Schneider, IE
McAvoy, LH
Frakt, AN
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Hlth Phys Educ & Recreat, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Kinesiol & Leisure Studies, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Widener Univ, Sch Law, Wilmington, DE USA
[5] Widener Univ, Sch Law, Harrisburg, PA USA
关键词
American Indians; climbing controversy; collaborative stewardship; conflict resolution; Devils Tower National Monument; establishment clause; first amendment; liberal democratic tradition; litigation; sacred sites;
D O I
10.1080/01490400252772845
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A dispute between American Indians and rock climbers over the appropriate use of Devils Tower National Monument in northeast Wyoming reflects fundamental differences in culture and world view. The United States Department of the Interior (USDI) National Park Service's (NPS) attempt to resolve this dispute with a voluntary ban on climbing during the month of June in deference to American Indian cultural and religious practices, and subsequent court rulings upholding the NPS policy, illustrate a widening circle of respect for and accommodation of divergent interpretations of humankind's relationship with the natural world.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 88
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, American Indians and National Parks
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, FED REG, V61
[3]  
[Anonymous], NATURE HUMAN SPIRIT
[4]  
ATLEO M, 1998, UNESCO SACR SIT S PA
[5]   SOCIAL IDENTITY, DISTINCTIVENESS, AND IN-GROUP HOMOGENEITY [J].
BREWER, MB .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 1993, 11 (01) :150-164
[6]  
Cornell G, 1990, NE INDIAN Q, V7, P3
[7]  
DELORIA V, 1992, RESTORATION MANAGEME, V10, P48
[9]  
DUSTIN D, 1998, TRENDS, V35, P27
[10]  
Dustin D, 1991, TRENDS, V28, P25