Phonological processing differences in bilinguals and monolinguals

被引：8

作者：

Tamminen, Henna ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Peltola, Maija S. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Toivonen, Heidi ^{[1
,2
]}

Kujala, Teija ^{[4
,5
]}

Naatanen, Risto ^{[5
,6
,7
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Turku, Dept Phonet, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland

[2] Univ Turku, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland

[3] Univ Turku, Dept Phonet, LAB Lab, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland

[4] Univ Helsinki, Cicero Learning Network, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

[5] Univ Helsinki, Inst Behav Sci, Cognit Brain Res Unit, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

[6] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Functionally Integrat Neurosci, Aarhus, Denmark

[7] Univ Tartu, Dept Psychol, Tartu, Estonia

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY | 2013年 / 87卷 / 01期

基金：

芬兰科学院;

关键词：

Bilingualism; Speech perception; Phonological processing; Mismatch negativity (MMN); MISMATCH NEGATIVITY MMN; PHONEME REPRESENTATIONS; BRAIN; DISCRIMINATION; RESPONSES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.003

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

The present study examined whether monolinguals and balanced bilinguals perceive speech sounds similarly or whether the two phonological systems in bilinguals interact so that one language is affected by the other. Two groups, monolingual native speakers of Finnish and balanced Finnish-Swedish bilinguals, were tested. We measured mismatch negativity (MMN) responses and used individually selected, native language, stimuli. The results revealed that balanced bilinguals had a significantly longer MMN latency than the monolinguals which suggests slower and weaker preattentive processing in the bilinguals. This implies that the two phonological systems are intertwined which decreases the access of exemplars. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：8 / 12

页数：5

共 27 条

[1]

Albert M. L., 1978, BILINGUAL BRAIN NEUR

[2]

Asu E. L., 2009, P FONETIK 2009 STOCK, P54

[3]

Bloomfield L, 1962, LANGUAGE

[4] Processing of visually presented sentences in mandarin and English studied with fMRI [J].

Chee, MWL ;

Caplan, D ;

Soon, CS ;

Sriram, N ;

Tan, EWL ;

Thiel, T ;

Weekes, B .

NEURON, 1999, 23 (01) :127-137

[5] Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain [J].

Cheour, M ;

Ceponiene, R ;

Lehtokoski, A ;

Luuk, A ;

Allik, J ;

Alho, K ;

Naatanen, R .

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 1 (05) :351-353

[6] Learning and Consolidation of Novel Spoken Words [J].

Davis, Matthew H. ;

Di Betta, Anna Maria ;

Macdonald, Mark J. E. ;

Gaskell, M. Gareth .

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 21 (04) :803-820

[7] NEUROLINGUISTS, BEWARE - THE BILINGUAL IS NOT 2 MONOLINGUALS IN ONE PERSON [J].

GROSJEAN, F .

BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1989, 36 (01) :3-15

[8] Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages [J].

Kim, KHS ;

Relkin, NR ;

Lee, KM ;

Hirsch, J .

NATURE, 1997, 388 (6638) :171-174

[9] THE NEURAL SUBSTRATES UNDERLYING WORD GENERATION - A BILINGUAL FUNCTIONAL-IMAGING STUDY [J].

KLEIN, D ;

MILNER, B ;

ZATORRE, RJ ;

MEYER, E ;

EVANS, AC .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1995, 92 (07) :2899-2903

[10] HUMAN ADULTS AND HUMAN INFANTS SHOW A PERCEPTUAL MAGNET EFFECT FOR THE PROTOTYPES OF SPEECH CATEGORIES, MONKEYS DO NOT [J].

KUHL, PK .

PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1991, 50 (02) :93-107

← 1 2 3 →