Building Social License for Automated Demand-Side Management-Case Study Research in the Swiss Residential Sector

被引:6
作者
Michellod, Julien Lancelot [1 ]
Kuch, Declan [2 ,3 ]
Winzer, Christian [4 ]
Patel, Martin K. [1 ]
Yilmaz, Selin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Sci, Inst Environm Sci ISE, Dept Energy Efficiency,Dept FA Forel Environm & A, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Inst Culture & Soc, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
[3] UNSW, Collaborat Energy & Environm Markets, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Energy & Environm CEE, Sch Management & Law, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
social license; demand-side management; acceptance; energy; automation; smart grid; DIRECT LOAD CONTROL; TIME-OF-USE; ELECTRICITY DEMAND; PERCEIVED CONTROL; HEAT-PUMPS; ENERGY; OPERATE; ACCEPTANCE; CONSUMER; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/en15207759
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Demand-side management (DSM) is increasingly needed for answering electricity flexibility needs in the upcoming transformation of energy systems. Use of automation leads to better efficiency, but its acceptance is problematic since it is linked with several issues, such as privacy or loss of control. Different approaches investigate what should be done for building community support for automation for the purpose of DSM, but it is only recently that literature has shown interest in the application of social license as a concept merging several issues traditionally treated separately. The social license concept emerged in the mining sector before being adopted for other problematic resources. It serves to identify different levels of community support for a project/company as well as various factors that influence it, such as economic and socio-political legitimacy and interactional trust. This paper investigates, through empirical evidence from eight case studies, what has been done in different contexts to build trust and legitimacy for an automated DSM project. Our findings suggest that patterns exist in respect of benefits, risks and rationale presented, the retention of control, information gathered, and inclusion and that these factors differ according to appliances/devices automated, operators of automation, and end-users targeted.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Ableitner L., 2020, SCHLUSSBERICHT COMMU
[2]   User behavior in a real-world peer-to-peer electricity market [J].
Ableitner, Liliane ;
Tiefenbeck, Verena ;
Meeuw, Arne ;
Woerner, Anselma ;
Fleisch, Elgar ;
Wortmann, Felix .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 270
[3]  
Adams Sophie., 2021, Social License to Automate
[4]   A methodology for community engagement in the introduction of renewable based smart microgrid [J].
Alvial-Palavicino, Carla ;
Garrido-Echeverria, Natalia ;
Jimenez-Estevez, Guillermo ;
Reyes, Lorenzo ;
Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 15 (03) :314-323
[5]   Laundry, energy and time: Insights from 20 years of time-use diary data in the United Kingdom [J].
Anderson, Ben .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 22 :125-136
[6]  
Annala S., 2012, P 9 INT C EUROPEAN E, P1
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Global Renewables Outlook: Energy Transformation 2050 p, P291
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, P DEM CTR C 2016 LAN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, P 12 IEA HEAT PUMP C
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GREEN GRID EN SAV CA