Discriminative power of three indices of renal calcium excretion for the distinction between familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia and primary hyperparathyroidism: a follow-up study on methods

被引:110
作者
Christensen, Signe Engkjaer [1 ]
Nissen, Peter H. [2 ]
Vestergaard, Peter [1 ]
Heickendorff, Lene [2 ]
Brixen, Kim [3 ]
Mosekilde, Leif [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab C, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03259.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH) must be differentiated from primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) because prognosis and treatment differ. In daily practice this discrimination is often based on the renal calcium excretion or the calcium/creatinine clearance ratio (CCCR). However, the diagnostic performance of these variables is poorly documented. Aim To appraise the power of various simple biochemical variables to differentiate between FHH and PHPT using calcium sensing receptor (CASR) gene analysis and histopathological findings as gold standards. Design Follow-up approach (direct design). Materials We included 54 FHH patients (17 males and 37 females, aged 18-75 years) with clinically significant mutations in the CASR gene and 97 hypercalcaemic patients with histologically verified PHPT (17 males and 80 females, aged 19-86 years). All PHPT patients became normocalcaemic following successful neck exploration. Results Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the CCCR was only marginally better, as judged by the area under curve (AUC = 0.923 +/- 0.021 (SE)), than the 24-h calcium/creatinine excretion ratio (AUC = 0.903 +/- 0.027) and the 24-h calcium excretion (AUC = 0.876 +/- 0.029). However, overlap performance analysis disclosed that the CCCR included fewer patients with PHPT together with the FHH patients than the other two variables at different cut-off points. Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off point for diagnosing FHH using CCCR was < 0.0115, which yielded a diagnostic specificity of 0.88 and a sensitivity of 0.80. Overlap analysis revealed that a cut-off point for CCCR at < 0.020 would sample 98% (53/54) of all patients with FHH and include 35% (34/97) of the PHPT patients. Conclusion Our results support the use of the CCCR as an initial screening test for FHH. We suggest a two-step diagnostic procedure, where the first step is based on the CCCR with a cut-off at < 0.020, and the second step is CASR gene analysis in patients with FHH or PHPT.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 720
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Summary statement from a workshop on asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: A perspective for the 21st century [J].
Bilezikian, JP ;
Potts, JT ;
El-Hajj Fuleihan, G ;
Kleerekoper, M ;
Neer, R ;
Peacock, M ;
Rastad, J ;
Silverberg, SJ ;
Udelsman, R ;
Wells, SA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2002, 87 (12) :5353-5361
[2]   Calcium-sensing receptor gene polymorphism A986S does not predict serum calcium level, bone mineral density, calcaneal ultrasound indices, or fracture rate in a large cohort of elderly women [J].
Bollerslev, J ;
Wilson, SG ;
Dick, IM ;
Devine, A ;
Dhaliwal, SS ;
Prince, RL .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 74 (01) :12-17
[3]   Extracellular calcium sensing and extracellular calcium signaling [J].
Brown, EM ;
MacLeod, RJ .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2001, 81 (01) :239-297
[4]   Parathyroid adenoma in a subject with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia: Coincidence or causality? [J].
Burski, K ;
Torjussen, B ;
Paulsen, AQ ;
Boman, H ;
Bollerslev, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2002, 87 (03) :1015-1016
[5]  
Bussey Aaron D, 2005, Endocr Pract, V11, P37
[6]   Familial hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria caused by a novel mutation in the cytoplasmic tail of the calcium receptor [J].
Carling, T ;
Szabo, E ;
Bai, M ;
Ridefelt, P ;
Westin, G ;
Gustavsson, P ;
Trivedi, S ;
Hellman, P ;
Brown, EM ;
Dahl, N ;
Rastad, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2000, 85 (05) :2042-2047
[7]   CLINICAL-TEST EVALUATION - BASIC CONCEPTS [J].
CHRISTENSEN, M .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1992, 52 :13-29
[8]   Diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism: controversies, practical issues and the need for Australian guidelines [J].
Glendenning, P .
INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2003, 33 (12) :598-603
[9]   Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests [J].
Greiner, M ;
Pfeiffer, D ;
Smith, RD .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2000, 45 (1-2) :23-41
[10]   URINE CALCIUM AND SERUM IONIZED CALCIUM, TOTAL CALCIUM AND PARATHYROID-HORMONE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM AND FAMILIAL BENIGN HYPERCALCEMIA [J].
GUNN, IR ;
WALLACE, JR .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 29 :52-58