Cost-benefit analysis according to Sen: An application in the evaluation of transport infrastructures in France

被引:21
作者
Hyard, Alexandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille 1, Fac Sci Econ & Sociales, F-59655 Villeneuve Dascq, France
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Amartya Sen; Transportation investment; Welfare economics; IMPACTS; FOUNDATIONS; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Made compulsory in France for major transport infrastructures, cost-benefit analysis is constantly being improved to achieve the best socio-economic evaluation possible. According to the philosopher and economist Amartya Sen, this analysis should meet two requirements: one ethical, the other democratic. We will examine the evaluation procedure in France and highlight the gap between its officially more democratic character and its still insufficiently ethical character, from the viewpoint of this dual requirement. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 719
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Rationality and freedom
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, PRINCIPES EC TRANSPO
[3]   Why Cost Benefit Analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective [J].
Beukers, Els ;
Bertolini, Luca ;
Brommelstroet, Marco Te .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (01) :68-78
[4]  
BOADWAY RW, 1974, ECON J, V84, P926
[5]  
Boiteux M., 2001, Transports: choix des investissements et cout des nuisances
[6]  
BRENT Robert J., 2006, Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis", V2nd
[7]  
Button KJ., 1982, TRANSPORT EC
[8]   MEASURING THE SOCIETAL IMPACTS OF AUTOMOBILE DOWNSIZING [J].
CARDELL, NS ;
DUNBAR, FC .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1980, 14 (5-6) :423-434
[9]  
Commissariat General au Developpement Durable (CGDD), 2009, POINT, V34, P1
[10]  
Conference Europeenne des Ministres des Transports (CEMT), 2004, EV PRIS DEC TRANSP D