The spatial framework for weight sensitivity analysis in AHP-based multi-criteria decision making

被引:148
作者
Chen, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Jia [2 ,3 ]
Khan, Shahbaz [4 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Shanghai Normal Univ, Dept Geog, Shanghai 200234, Peoples R China
[3] E China Normal Univ, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[4] UNESCO Reg Sci Bur Asia & Pacific, Jakarta, Indonesia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pairwise comparison matrix; Uncertainty; OAT; MCDM; ArcGIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; MODEL; GIS; DESIGN; IDENTIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; POLLUTION; SUPPORT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.010
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Criteria weights determined from pairwise comparisons are often the greatest contributor to the uncertainties in the AHP-based multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). During an MCDM process, the weights can be changed directly by adjusting the output from a pairwise comparison matrix, or indirectly by recalculating the matrix after varying its input. Corresponding weight sensitivity on multi-criteria evaluation results is generally difficult to be quantitatively assessed and spatially visualized. This study developed a unique methodology which extends the AHP-SA model proposed by Chen et al. (2010) to a more comprehensive framework to analyze weight sensitivity caused by both direct and indirect weight changes using the one-at-a-time (OAT) technique. With increased efficiency, improved flexibility and enhanced visualization capability, the spatial framework was developed as AHP-SA2 within a GIS platform. A case study with in-depth discussion is provided to demonstrate the new toolset. It assists stakeholders and researchers with better understanding of weight sensitivity for characterising, reporting and minimising uncertainty in the AHP-based spatial MCDM. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 140
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   A variance-based sensitivity index function for factor prioritization [J].
Allaire, Douglas L. ;
Willcox, Karen E. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 107 :107-114
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, EXPT PLANNING DESIGN
[3]   Sensitivity measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the use of bootstrap [J].
Archer, GEB ;
Saltelli, A ;
Sobol, IM .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 1997, 58 (02) :99-120
[5]   Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models [J].
Butler, J ;
Jia, JM ;
Dyer, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 103 (03) :531-546
[6]   An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models [J].
Campolongo, Francesca ;
Cariboni, Jessica ;
Saltelli, Andrea .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (10) :1509-1518
[7]   Uncertainty analysis in a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis tool for river catchment management [J].
Chen, H. ;
Wood, M. D. ;
Linstead, C. ;
Maltby, E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (04) :395-405
[8]   Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation [J].
Chen, Y. ;
Yu, J. ;
Khan, S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2010, 25 (12) :1582-1591
[9]   TO RETIRE OR EXPAND? A FUZZY GIS-BASED SPATIAL MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE [J].
Chen, Yun ;
Khan, Shahbaz ;
Paydar, Zahra .
IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2010, 59 (02) :174-188
[10]   Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS [J].
Crosetto, M ;
Tarantola, S ;
Saltelli, A .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 81 (01) :71-79