Cross-Situational Learning of Phonologically Overlapping Words Across Degrees of Ambiguity

被引:15
作者
Mulak, Karen E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vlach, Haley A. [2 ,4 ]
Escudero, Paola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, MARCS Inst Brain Behav & Dev, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Australian Res Council Ctr Excellence Dynam Langu, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, 0100 LeFrak Hall, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Educ Psychol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Cross-situational learning; Statistical learning; Word learning; Phonological encoding; Consonants vs; vowels; CONSONANTS; LANGUAGE; PERCEPTION; VOWELS; RECOGNITION; CONSTRAINTS; INFORMATION; HEARING; MEMORY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.12731
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Cross-situational word learning (XSWL) tasks present multiple words and candidate referents within a learning trial such that word-referent pairings can be inferred only across trials. Adults encode fine phonological detail when two words and candidate referents are presented in each learning trial (2 x 2 scenario; Escudero, Mulak, & Vlach, ). To test the relationship between XSWL task difficulty and phonological encoding, we examined XSWL of words differing by one vowel or consonant across degrees of within-learning trial ambiguity (1 x 1 to 4 x 4). Word identification was assessed alongside three distractors. Adults finely encoded words via XSWL: Learning occurred in all conditions, though accuracy decreased across the 1 x 1 to 3 x 3 conditions. Accuracy was highest for the 1 x 1 condition, suggesting fast-mapping is a stronger learning strategy here. Accuracy was higher for consonant than vowel set targets, and having more distractors from the same set mitigated identification of vowel set targets only, suggesting possible stronger encoding of consonants than vowels.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models
    Allopenna, PD
    Magnuson, JS
    Tanenhaus, MK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (04) : 419 - 439
  • [2] [Anonymous], LANG SCI
  • [3] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [4] CROSS-LANGUAGE STUDY OF PERCEPTION OF THE ORAL NASAL DISTINCTION
    BEDDOR, PS
    STRANGE, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1982, 71 (06) : 1551 - 1561
  • [5] Competition between multiple words for a referent in cross-situational word learning
    Benitez, Viridiana L.
    Yurovsky, Daniel
    Smith, Linda B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2016, 90 : 31 - 48
  • [6] Word learning under infinite uncertainty
    Blythe, Richard A.
    Smith, Andrew D. M.
    Smith, Kenny
    [J]. COGNITION, 2016, 151 : 18 - 27
  • [7] Clements G. N., 1990, PAPERS LAB PHONOLOGY, P283, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017
  • [8] SOUND OF VOWELS AND CONSONANTS IN IMMEDIATE MEMORY
    CROWDER, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1971, 10 (06): : 587 - 596
  • [9] Weighting of vowel cues explains patterns of word-object associative learning
    Curtin, Suzanne
    Fennell, Christopher
    Escudero, Paola
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2009, 12 (05) : 725 - 731
  • [10] Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection:: Cross-linguistic comparisons
    Cutler, A
    Sebastián-Gallés, N
    Soler-Vilageliu, O
    van Ooijen, B
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (05) : 746 - 755