Is a parallel elastic element responsible for the enhancement of steady-state muscle force following active stretch?

被引:14
作者
Bullimore, S. R. [1 ]
MacIntosh, B. R. [1 ]
Herzog, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Kinesiol, Human Performance Lab, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
muscle mechanics; fibre; cell; slack test; eccentric contraction; lengthening;
D O I
10.1242/jeb.021204
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
For over 50 years, it has been recognised that muscles from many different species of animals are able to generate a higher steady-state isometric force after active stretch than during a purely isometric contraction at the same length. This is known as. residual force enhancement' (rFE). The mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains controversial. One proposal is that an elastic element parallel to the cross-bridges becomes stiffer, or is engaged, when the muscle is activated and generates force when stretched. If this is indeed the sole mechanism, then rFE should be eliminated by subsequently shortening the muscle by a distance equal to or greater than the initial stretch. We tested this hypothesis using six intact single fibres from frog lumbrical muscle. The fibres were activated and stretched to generate rFE and then rapidly shortened by between 25% and 700% of the initial stretch distance. In contrast to previous reports, we found that rapid shortening induced a depression of subsequent isometric force. We used two methods to account for this force depression when calculating rFE, thereby obtaining upper and lower bounds for the true rFE. With both methods of calculation, rFE was significantly greater than zero when shortening distance was equal to stretch distance (P= 0.0004 and P= 0.03, respectively). Therefore, our hypothesis was not supported. We conclude that rFE is unlikely to be generated solely by a parallel elastic element.
引用
收藏
页码:3001 / 3008
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ABBOTT BC, 1952, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V117, P77
[2]   A non-cross-bridge stiffness in activated frog muscle fibers [J].
Bagni, MA ;
Cecchi, G ;
Colombini, B ;
Colomo, F .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 82 (06) :3118-3127
[3]  
Bianco P, 2007, BIOPHYS J, V93, P2102, DOI [10.1529/biophysj.107.106153, 10.1529/biophysj.l07.106153]
[4]   History-dependence of isometric muscle force: Effect of prior stretch or shortening amplitude [J].
Bullimore, Sharon R. ;
Leonard, Tim R. ;
Rassier, Dilson E. ;
Herzog, Walter .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (07) :1518-1524
[5]   RESIDUAL FORCE ENHANCEMENT AFTER STRETCH OF CONTRACTING FROG SINGLE MUSCLE-FIBERS [J].
EDMAN, KAP ;
ELZINGA, G ;
NOBLE, MIM .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 80 (05) :769-784
[6]  
EDMAN KAP, 1980, ACTA PHYSIOL SCAND, V109, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1980.tb06559.x
[7]  
EDMAN KAP, 1984, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V170, P739
[8]   MECHANICAL DEACTIVATION INDUCED BY ACTIVE SHORTENING IN ISOLATED MUSCLE-FIBERS OF FROG [J].
EDMAN, KAP .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1975, 246 (01) :255-275
[9]   VELOCITY OF UNLOADED SHORTENING AND ITS RELATION TO SARCOMERE LENGTH AND ISOMETRIC FORCE IN VERTEBRATE MUSCLE-FIBERS [J].
EDMAN, KAP .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1979, 291 (JUN) :143-159
[10]  
EDMAN KAP, 1993, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V466, P535