A Bayesian Neo-Normal Mixture Model (Nenomimo) for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation

被引:3
作者
Pravitasari, Anindya Apriliyanti [1 ,2 ]
Iriawan, Nur [2 ]
Fithriasari, Kartika [2 ]
Purnami, Santi Wulan [2 ]
Irhamah [2 ]
Ferriastuti, Widiana [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padjadjaran, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Dept Stat, Jl Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Bandung 45363, Indonesia
[2] Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember, Fac Sci & Data Analyt, Dept Stat, Jl Arif Rahman Hakim, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
[3] Univ Airlangga, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 14期
关键词
MRI; image segmentation; neo-normal; mixture model; Bayesian; MCMC;
D O I
10.3390/app10144892
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The detection of a brain tumor through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is still challenging when the image is in low quality. Image segmentation could be done to provide a clear brain tumor area as the region of interest. In this study, we propose an improved model-based clustering approach for MRI-based image segmentation. The main contribution is the use of the adaptive neo-normal distributions in the form of a finite mixture model that could handle both symmetrical and asymmetrical patterns in an MRI image. The neo-normal mixture model (Nenomimo) also resolves the limitation of the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and the generalized GMM (GGMM), which are limited by the short-tailed form of their distributions and their sensitivity against noise. Model estimation is done through an optimization process using the Bayesian method coupled with a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach, and it employs a silhouette coefficient to find the optimum number of clusters. The performance of the Nenomimo was evaluated against the GMM and the GGMM using the misclassification ratio (MCR). Finally, this study discovered that the Nenomimo provides better segmentation results for both simulated and real data sets, with an averageMCRfor MRI brain tumor image segmentation of less than 3%.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   When can we improve on sample average approximation for stochastic optimization? [J].
Anderson, Edward ;
Nguyen, Harrison .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 48 (05) :566-572
[2]  
[Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, HDB MIXTURE ANAL
[4]  
AZZALINI A, 1985, SCAND J STAT, V12, P171
[5]  
Box George EP, 2011, Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis, V40
[6]   Detecting Clinically Meaningful Shape Clusters in Medical Image Data: Metrics Analysis for Hierarchical Clustering Applied to Healthy and Pathological Aortic Arches [J].
Bruse, Jan L. ;
Zuluaga, Maria A. ;
Khushnood, Abbas ;
McLeod, Kristin ;
Ntsinjana, Hopewell N. ;
Hsia, Tain-Yen ;
Sermesant, Maxime ;
Pennec, Xavier ;
Taylor, Andrew M. ;
Schievano, Silvia .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 64 (10) :2373-2383
[7]   MSEPBurr Distribution: Properties and Parameter Estimation [J].
Choir, Achmad Syahrul ;
Iriawan, Nur ;
Ulama, Brodjol Sutijo Suprih ;
Dokhi, Mohammad .
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS AND OPERATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (01) :179-193
[8]   Image Denoising with Generalized Gaussian Mixture Model Patch Priors [J].
Deledalle, Charles-Alban ;
Parameswaran, Shibin ;
Nguyen, Truong Q. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON IMAGING SCIENCES, 2018, 11 (04) :2568-2609
[9]   On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness [J].
Fernandez, C ;
Steel, MFJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 93 (441) :359-371
[10]   Mixtures of Shifted Asymmetric Laplace Distributions [J].
Franczak, Brian C. ;
Browne, Ryan P. ;
McNicholas, Paul D. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2014, 36 (06) :1149-1157