Hepatocellular Carcinoma versus Other Hepatic Malignancy in Cirrhosis: Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018

被引:94
作者
Kim, Yeun-Yoon [1 ]
Kim, Myeong-Jin [1 ]
Kim, Eun Hwa [2 ]
Roh, Yun Ho [2 ]
An, Chansik [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Yonsei Ro 50-1, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Biostat Collaborat Unit,Dept Biomed Syst Informat, Yonsei Ro 50-1, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
DATA SYSTEM; INTRAHEPATIC CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; DIFFERENTIATION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019181995
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for differentiating between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other (hepatic) malignancy (OM) in patients with liver cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: From 2008 to 2017, 55 patients with untreated OM and liver cirrhosis were eligible for this retrospective case-control study (mean age, 58 years +/- 10 [standard deviation] [range, 32279 years], with 45 men [mean age, 58 years +/- 11] and 10 women [mean age, 62 years +/- 7]). Control subjects consisted of 165 treatment-naive patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis (mean age, 58 years +/- 10 [range, 29280 years], with 134 men [mean age, 58 years +/- 9] and 31 women [mean age, 59 years +/- 11]). Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis independently determined the presence of LR-M features and major HCC features (non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout, and enhancing capsule). The diagnostic performances of each feature, the LR-M criteria (probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for HCC), and the LR-5 criteria (definitely HCC) were calculated and compared by using the generalized estimating equation method. Results: Individual LR-M features had a sensitivity of 9%-271% and a specificity of 83%-297% for the diagnosis of OM. Major features of HCC had a sensitivity of 62%-283% and a specificity of 69%-289% for the diagnosis of HCC. The LR-M criteria had a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81%, 97%) for diagnosing OM, with a specificity of 48% (95% CI: 40%, 56%). The LR-5 criteria had a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 67%, 81%) for diagnosing HCC, with a specificity of 89% (95% CI: 81%, 97%). The accuracy of the LR-5 criteria was higher than that of the LR-M criteria (78% [95% CI: 72%, 83%] vs 58% [95% CI: 52%, 65%], P<.001). Conclusion: The LR-5 criteria as well as the LR-M criteria can effectively distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis. (c) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] American College of Radiology, CT MRI LIV IM REP DA
  • [2] American college of radiology, LIV IM REP DAT SYST
  • [3] cHCC-CCA: Consensus terminology for primary liver carcinomas with both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentation
    Brunt, Elizabeth
    Aishima, Shinichi
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    Fowler, Kathryn
    Goodman, Zachary
    Gores, Gregory
    Gouw, Annette
    Kagen, Alex
    Klimstra, David
    Komuta, Mina
    Kondo, Fukuo
    Miksad, Rebecca
    Nakano, Masayuki
    Nakanuma, Yasuni
    Ng, Irene
    Paradis, Valerie
    Park, Young Nyun
    Quaglia, Alberto
    Roncalli, Massimo
    Roskams, Tania
    Sakamoto, Michiie
    Saxena, Romil
    Sempoux, Christine
    Sirlin, Claude
    Stueck, Ashley
    Thung, Swan
    Tsui, W. M. S.
    Wang, Xin-Wei
    Wee, Aileen
    Yano, Hirohisa
    Yeh, Matthew
    Zen, Yoh
    Zucman-Rossi, Jessica
    Theise, Neil
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 (01) : 113 - 126
  • [4] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Do, Richard K.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Tang, An
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 816 - 830
  • [5] Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis: Differentiation from Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging and Dynamic CT
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Kim, So Yeon
    Park, So Hyun
    Park, Seong Ho
    Kim, Kang Mo
    Hong, Seung-Mo
    Yu, Eunsil
    Lee, Moon-Gyu
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 282 (03) : 771 - 781
  • [6] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 With Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation of LI-RADS Category 4 and 5 Criteria
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, So Jung
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Kim, Pyo Nyun
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (08) : 483 - 490
  • [7] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System with MR Imaging: Evaluation in Nodules 20 mm or Smaller Detected in Cirrhosis at Screening US
    Darnell, Anna
    Forner, Alejandro
    Rimola, Jordi
    Reig, Maria
    Garcia-Criado, Angeles
    Ayuso, Carmen
    Bruix, Jordi
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (03) : 698 - 707
  • [8] FERENCI P, 1984, LIVER, V4, P7
  • [9] LI-RADS M (LR-M): definite or probable malignancy, not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Potretzke, Theodora A.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Costa, Eduardo A.
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 149 - 157
  • [10] Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Hepatic Malignancies in Patients at Risk: Diagnostic Performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Sytem Version 2014
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Tsai, Richard
    Rohe, Eric
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Salter, Amber
    Nalbantoglu, ILKe
    Heiken, Jay P.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (01) : 158 - 172