Comparative in vivo study of commercially pure Ti implants with surfaces modified by laser with and without silicate deposition: Biomechanical and scanning electron microscopy analysis

被引:24
作者
Souza, Francisley A. [1 ,2 ]
Queiroz, Thallita P. [1 ,2 ]
Guastaldi, Antonio C. [3 ]
Garcia-Junior, Idelmo R. [1 ,2 ]
Magro-Filho, Osvaldo [1 ,2 ]
Nishioka, Renato S. [4 ]
Sisti, Karin E. [5 ]
Sonoda, Celso K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Gen Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho UNESP, Inst Chem, Dept Phys Chem, Biomat Grp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho UNESP, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthesis, Sao Jose Campos Dent Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Mato Grosso UFMS, Sch Med, Dept Clin Surg, Cuiaba, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
biomechanics; bone remodeling; SEM techniques; dental implants; surface modification; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; REMOVAL TORQUE; APATITE FORMATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; INTEGRATION; TOPOGRAPHY; OSSEOTITE; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.32818
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate commercially pure titanium implant surfaces modified by laser beam (LS) and LS associated with sodium silicate (SS) deposition, and compare them with machined surface (MS) and dual acid-etching surfaces (AS) modified. Topographic characterization was performed by scanning electron microscopyX-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEMEDX), and by mean roughness measurement before surgery. Thirty rabbits received 60 implants in their right and left tibias. One implant of each surface in each tibia. The implants were removed by reverse torque for vivo biomechanical analysis at 30, 60, and 90 days postoperative. In addition, the surface of the implants removed at 30 days postoperative was analyzed by SEMEDX. The topographic characterization showed differences between the analyzed surfaces, and the mean roughness values of LS and SS were statistically higher than AS and MS. At 30 days, values removal torque LS and SS groups showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) when compared with MS and AS. At 60 days, groups LS and SS showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) when compared with MS. At 90 days, only group SS presented statistically higher (p < 0.05) in comparison with MS. The authors can conclude that physical chemistry properties and topographical of LS and SS implants increases bone-implant interaction and provides higher degree of osseointegration when compared with MS and AS. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 101B: 7684, 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 84
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Albrektsson T, 2004, INT J PROSTHODONT, V17, P536
  • [2] Biomimetic apatite formation on Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) using modified biomimetic solution
    Aparecida, Anahi H.
    Fook, Marcus V. L.
    Guastaldi, Antonio C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 20 (06) : 1215 - 1222
  • [3] Surface modification of Ti dental implants by Nd:: YVO4 laser irradiation
    Braga, Francisco J. C.
    Marques, Rodrigo F. C.
    Filho, Edson de A.
    Guastaldi, Antonio C.
    [J]. APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2007, 253 (23) : 9203 - 9208
  • [4] OSSEOINTEGRATED TITANIUM FIXTURES IN THE TREATMENT OF EDENTULOUSNESS
    BRANEMARK, PI
    ADELL, R
    ALBREKTSSON, T
    LEKHOLM, U
    LUNDKVIST, S
    ROCKLER, B
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 1983, 4 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [5] Buser D, 1998, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V13, P611
  • [6] Buser D, 1999, J BIOMED MATER RES, V45, P75, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-P
  • [8] INFLUENCE OF SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS ON BONE INTEGRATION OF TITANIUM IMPLANTS - A HISTOMORPHOMETRIC STUDY IN MINIATURE PIGS
    BUSER, D
    SCHENK, RK
    STEINEMANN, S
    FIORELLINI, JP
    FOX, CH
    STICH, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1991, 25 (07): : 889 - 902
  • [9] Carlsson L, 1988, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V3, P21
  • [10] Carvalho PSP, 2002, IMPLANTES OSSEOINTEG, P1