Environmental learning in regions: a social capital based approach. The case of Latvia

被引:1
作者
Sechi, Guido [1 ,2 ]
Borri, Dino [2 ]
De Lucia, Caterina [2 ,3 ]
Celmins, Viesturs [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Latvia, Dept Human Geog, Riga, Latvia
[2] Politecn Bari, Dipartimento Ingn Civile Ambientale Terr Edile &, Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Foggia, Dipartimento Econ, Foggia, Italy
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Social Anthropol, Gonville & Caius Coll, Cambridge, England
关键词
Environmental learning; social capital; micro level; Latvia; structural equation modelling; ROTATION WOODY CROPS; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; AGRICULTURAL LAND; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; TACIT KNOWLEDGE; MEDIATING ROLE; WEAK TIES; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; CREATION;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2016.1214867
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
How do people learn about the environment and behave accordingly? What is the cognitive process at the base of this learning mechanism? The present paper is a pilot work investigating the dynamics of individual environmental knowledge on the basis of social capital theory. Using Tsai and Ghoshal's findings, a well known framework widely accepted in organizational studies which supports the existence of a relationship between structural, relational and cognitive dimensions of social capital, and between social capital and knowledge exchange, these dynamics are then tested in the context of environmental behaviour studies. The quantitative analysis is carried out by means of a structural equation model based on data collected in the Republic of Latvia. Results support main theoretical hypotheses, but several effects are found to be highly sensitive to control variables (residence place dimensions, ethnic affiliation, age, personal income), leading to hypothesise a strong dependency of environmental learning patterns on the socio-demographic, socio-economic and cognitive context.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 364
页数:22
相关论文
共 91 条
[71]  
Nabil N. A., 2015, HBRC Journal, V11, P285, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HBRCJ.2014.03.009
[72]   Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage [J].
Nahapiet, J ;
Ghoshal, S .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (02) :242-266
[73]  
NONAKA I, 1991, HARVARD BUS REV, V69, P96
[74]  
Nonaka I., 1995, The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, DOI DOI 10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3
[75]  
Parliament of the Republic of Latvia, 2010, SUST DEV STRAT LATV
[76]  
PERLMUTTER HV, 1969, COLUMBIA J WORLD BUS, V4, P9
[77]  
Polanyi M., 1966, The Tacit Dimension
[78]   Social capital and the environment [J].
Pretty, J ;
Ward, H .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (02) :209-227
[79]  
Putnam Robert D., 1993, Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7S8R7
[80]   Social capital and disaster preparedness among low income Mexican Americans in a disaster prone area [J].
Reininger, Belinda M. ;
Rahbar, Mohammad H. ;
Lee, MinJae ;
Chen, Zhongxue ;
Alam, Sartaj R. ;
Pope, Jennifer ;
Adams, Barbara .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 83 :50-60