Monte Carlo calculations of the dose distribution around a commercial gynecologic tandem applicator

被引:15
作者
Gifford, KA [1 ]
Mourtada, F [1 ]
Cho, SH [1 ]
Lawyer, A [1 ]
Horton, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Monte Carlo simulation; tandem applicator; Cs-137; tip screw;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2005.09.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Dose rate distributions around Fletcher Suit Delclos (FSD) tandem applicators used for intracavitary brachytherapy are usually calculated by assuming each source is a point source and summing the contributions from each of the sources. Consequently, interpellet attenuation and scattering are ignored. Additional error may be introduced because the applicator walls and tip screw are not considered. The focus of this study was a Monte Carlo simulation of a Selectron tandem, verification of the calculations, and presentation of the implications of the point-source approximation for treatment planning. Materials and methods: MCNPX 2.4.k was used to calculate dose rate distributions around straight and curved tandems. The Monte Carlo calculations were verified with radiochromic film. Results: MCNPX calculated dose to within +/- 2% or +/- 2 mm for 97% of the points on the film parallel to the long axis and 98% on a film perpendicular to the long axis of the straight portion of the tandem. The point source approximation overestimated dose by as much as 33% superior to the tip of the tandem as compared to MCNPX. The point source approximation overestimated dose when photons passed through multiple pellets by as much as 18% as compared to MCNPX. Laterally, the dose distribution was not affected greatly. Conclusions: Interpellet attenuation was a dominant factor in determining the distribution along the length of the pellet train. MCNPX calculated doses accurately when the pellets and applicator walls were included in the geometry. The point source approximation is adequate lateral to the tandem. The point source approximation does not calculate dose accurately superior to the tandem or when photons pass through multiple pellets. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 215
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BNLNCS52142
[2]   Monte Carlo calculation of dose rate distributions around Ir-192 wires [J].
Ballester, F ;
Hernandez, C ;
PerezCalatayud, J ;
Lliso, F .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (08) :1221-1228
[3]   Brachytherapy dosimetry of 125I and 103Pd sources using an updated cross section library for the MCNP Monte Carlo transport code [J].
Bohm, TD ;
DeLuca, PM ;
DeWerd, LA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (04) :701-711
[4]   The dose distribution of low dose rate Cs-137 in intracavitary brachytherapy: comparison of Monte Carlo simulation, treatment planning calculation and polymer gel measurement [J].
Fragoso, M ;
Love, PA ;
Verhaegen, F ;
Nalder, C ;
Bidmead, AM ;
Leach, M ;
Webb, S .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (24) :5459-5474
[5]   Comparison of three high-resolution digitizers for radiochromic film dosimetry [J].
Gluckman, GR ;
Reinstein, LE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (08) :1839-1846
[6]   SOURCE CONFIGURATION AND DOSE-RATES FOR THE SELECTRON AFTERLOADING EQUIPMENT FOR GYNECOLOGIC APPLICATORS [J].
GRIGSBY, PW ;
WILLIAMSON, JF ;
PEREZ, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 24 (02) :321-327
[7]  
HENDRICKS J, 2003, LAUR032202
[8]   CLINICAL ELECTRON-BEAM DOSIMETRY - REPORT OF AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK GROUP NO-25 [J].
KHAN, FM ;
DOPPKE, KP ;
HOGSTROM, KR ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
NATH, R ;
PRASAD, SC ;
PURDY, JA ;
ROZENFELD, M ;
WERNER, BL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (01) :73-109
[9]   On the validity of the superposition principle in dose calculations for intracavitary implants with shielded vaginal colpostats [J].
Markman, J ;
Williamson, JF ;
Dempsey, JF ;
Low, DA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (02) :147-155
[10]   EFFECTIVE ATTENUATION IN WATER OF GAMMA RAYS OF GOLD 198 IRIDIUM 192 CESIUM 137 RADIUM 226 AND COBALT 60 [J].
MEISBERGER, LL ;
KELLER, RJ ;
SHALEK, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1968, 90 (05) :953-+