Preparing the Next Generation of Family Physicians to Improve Population Health: A CERA Study

被引:0
作者
Vickery, Katherine Diaz [1 ]
Rindfleisch, Kirsten [2 ]
Benson, Janice [3 ]
Furlong, Judith [4 ]
Martinez-Bianchi, Viviana [5 ]
Richardson, Caroline R. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Promedica Hlth Syst, Flower Hosp Family Med Residency, Sylvania, OH USA
[5] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE; COMMUNITY-MEDICINE; EDUCATION; PROGRAM; COPC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family medicine leaders cite population health as a key tenet in the strategic plan outlining family medicine's role in improving America's health. Yet little is known about current practice in training family physicians in this area. This study describes the current practice and teaching of community medicine and population health in family medicine residency programs to support the broader goal of preparing the next generation of family physicians to deliver comprehensive primary care while improving population health. METHODS: Questions were added to the 2013 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) program directors (PD) survey detailing current teaching practices and identifying self-rated exemplary programs. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to predict program strength. RESULTS: A quarter of responding PDs (n=56) self-rate the strength of their community medicine curriculum; they are more likely to: have a faculty champion, have strong public health partnerships, teach community-oriented primary care well, and tend to serve densely populated regions (>500K). PDs ranked "knowledge and use of community resources" (n=142, 63%) and "teamwork" (n=127, 57%) as areas of community medicine taught best and research/evaluation (n=120, 54%) and population health (n=105, 47%) as areas not taught well. Resident/faculty time are cited as barriers to curricular success (n=144, 64% and n=134, 60%). CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine is well poised to take leadership in the teaching and practice of population health. Yet improvements are still needed and may be supported by dedicated time for faculty/residents, development of faculty champions, and targeted training in rural and suburban areas.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 788
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, PROGR I ACCR FAM MED
[2]  
American Academy of Family Physicians, FAM MED FACTS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PRIM CAR PUBL HLTH E
[4]  
Baldor R, 2014, FAM MED, V46, P88
[5]  
Booske B., 2010, DIFFERENT PERSPECTIV
[6]  
Brill John R, 2002, Acad Med, V77, P747, DOI 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00036
[7]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2014 DEF STAG 1 MEAN
[8]  
Dobbie A, 2006, FAM MED, V38, P399
[9]  
Dysinger WS, 2011, FAM MED, V43, P480
[10]   Advanced Primary Care in San Antonio: Linking Practice and Community Strategies to Improve Health [J].
Ferrer, Robert L. ;
Schlenker, Carolina Gonzalez ;
Romero, Raquel Lozano ;
Poursani, Ramin ;
Bazaldua, Oralia ;
Davidson, DeWayne ;
Gonzales, Melissa Ann ;
DeHoyos, Janie ;
Castilla, Martha ;
Corona, Betty A. ;
Tysinger, James ;
Alsip, Bryan ;
Trejo, Jonathan ;
Jaen, Carlos Roberto .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (03) :288-298