CERVICAL SPINE MOTION DURING EXTRICATION

被引:26
作者
Engsberg, Jack R. [1 ]
Standeven, John W. [1 ]
Shurtleff, Timothy L. [1 ]
Eggars, Jessica L. [1 ]
Shafer, Jeffery S. [2 ]
Naunheim, Rosanne S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, St Louis Sch Med, Program Occupat Therapy, Human Performance Lab, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
[2] Washington Univ, St Louis Sch Med, Div Emergency Med, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
关键词
immobilization; vehicle extrication; spine; transportation of patients; video motion capture; EXAMINING MOTION; IMMOBILIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.082
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: It has been estimated that up to one-quarter of spinal cord injuries may be significantly worsened during extrication or early treatment after a motor vehicle accident. Study Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the planar motions of the head relative to the torso during extrication from an automobile in a laboratory setting. Methods: Video motion capture was used to quantify the range of motion of the head relative to the torso in 10 participants as they were extricated from a mock motor vehicle during four different extrication techniques: 1) Unassisted Unprotected, 2) Unassisted Protected with a cervical collar (CC), 3) Assisted and Protected with a CC, and 4) Assisted and Protected with a CC and Kendrick Extrication Device. Results: The results indicated a significant decrease in movement for all motions when the driver exited the vehicle unassisted with CC protection, compared to exiting unassisted and without protection. Decreases in movement were also observed for an event (i.e., Pivot in seat) during extrication with paramedic assistance and protection. However, no movement reduction was observed in another event (i.e., Recline on board) with both paramedic assistance and protection. Conclusion: In this study, no decrease in neck movement occurred for certain extrication events that included protection and assistance by the paramedics. Future work should further investigate this finding. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 127
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] American College of Surgeons, 2004, ADV TRAUM LIF SUPP P, P53
  • [2] Burton John H, 2005, Prehosp Emerg Care, V9, P303, DOI 10.1080/10903120590962003
  • [3] A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF CERVICAL IMMOBILIZATION USED IN PATIENT EXTRICATION AND TRANSPORT
    CLINE, JR
    SCHEIDEL, E
    BIGSBY, EF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1985, 25 (07) : 649 - 653
  • [4] Prospective comparison of gait and trunk range of motion in adolescents with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis undergoing anterior or posterior spinal fusion
    Engsberg, JR
    Lenke, LG
    Uhrich, ML
    Ross, SA
    Bridwell, KH
    [J]. SPINE, 2003, 28 (17) : 1993 - 2000
  • [5] A RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF PREHOSPITAL CERVICAL IMMOBILIZATION METHODS
    GRAZIANO, AF
    SCHEIDEL, EA
    CLINE, JR
    BAER, LJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1987, 16 (10) : 1127 - 1131
  • [6] Hadley Mark N, 2002, Clin Neurosurg, V49, P407
  • [7] Hann A, 2004, EMERGENCY TECHNOLOGI
  • [8] A PRACTICAL RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF SHORT BOARD TECHNIQUE AND KENDRICK EXTRICATION DEVICE
    HOWELL, JM
    BURROW, R
    DUMONTIER, C
    HILLYARD, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1989, 18 (09) : 943 - 946
  • [9] MEASUREMENT OF LOWER-EXTREMITY KINEMATICS DURING LEVEL WALKING
    KADABA, MP
    RAMAKRISHNAN, HK
    WOOTTEN, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1990, 8 (03) : 383 - 392
  • [10] KARBI OA, 1988, CAN MED ASSOC J, V139, P617