Meta-analysis of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for relief of spinal pain

被引:59
作者
Resende, L. [1 ]
Merriwether, E. [2 ]
Rampazo, E. P. [3 ]
Dailey, D. [2 ]
Embree, J. [2 ]
Deberg, J. [4 ]
Liebano, R. E. [3 ]
Sluka, K. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sergipe, Physiol Sci Grad Program, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
[2] Univ Iowa, Pain Res Program, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil Sci, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Phys Therapy, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Iowa, Hardin Lib User Serv, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; SEARCH STRATEGIES; TENS; THERAPY; PEOPLE; CLASSIFICATION; DISABILITY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1168
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis analysing the existing data on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or interferential current (IFC) for chronic low back pain (CLBP) and/or neck pain (CNP) taking into account intensity and timing of stimulation, examining pain, function and disability. Seven electronic databases were searched for TENS or IFC treatment in non-specific CLBP or CNP. Four reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TENS or IFC intervention in adult individuals with non-specific CLBP or CNP. Primary outcomes were for self-reported pain intensity and back-specific disability. Two reviewers performed quality assessment, and two reviewers extracted data using a standardized form. Nine RCTs were selected (eight CLBP; one CNP), and seven studies with complete data sets were included for meta-analysis (655 participants). For CLBP, meta-analysis shows TENS/IFC intervention, independent of time of assessment, was significantly different from placebo/control (p<0.02). TENS/IFC intervention was better than placebo/control, during therapy (p=0.02), but not immediately after therapy (p=0.08), or 1-3months after therapy (p=0.99). Analysis for adequate stimulation parameters was not significantly different, and there was no effect on disability. This systematic review provides inconclusive evidence of TENS benefits in low back pain patients because the quality of the studies was low, andadequate parameters and timing of assessment were not uniformly used or reported. Without additional high-quality clinical trials usingsufficient sample sizes and adequate parameters and outcome assessments, the outcomes of this review are likely to remain unchanged. SignificanceThese data highlight the need for additional high-quality RCTs to examine the effects of TENS in CLBP. Trials should consider intensity of stimulation, timing of outcome assessment and assessment of pain, disability and function.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 678
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Is mechanical pain threshold after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increased locally and unilaterally? A randomized placebocontrolled trial in healthy subjects [J].
Aarskog, Reidar ;
Johnson, Mark I. ;
Demmink, Jan Hendrik ;
Lofthus, Anne ;
Iversen, Vegard ;
Lopes-Martins, Rodrigo ;
Joensen, Jon ;
Bjordal, Jan M. .
PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 12 (04) :251-263
[2]   Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain [J].
Airaksinen, O. ;
Brox, J. I. ;
Cedraschi, C. ;
Hildebrandt, J. ;
Klaber-Moffett, J. ;
Kovacs, F. ;
Mannion, A. F. ;
Reis, S. ;
Staal, J. B. ;
Ursin, H. ;
Zanoli, G. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) :S192-S300
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[4]  
[Anonymous], DEC MEM TRANSC EL NE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[6]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[7]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[8]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, WORLD J SPORT SCI
[10]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY