Intertemporal asset pricing with bitcoin

被引:15
作者
Koutmos, Dimitrios [1 ]
Payne, James E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Accounting Finance & Business Law, Coll Business, Corpus Christi, TX 78412 USA
[2] Univ Texas El Paso, Coll Business Adm, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
关键词
Asset pricing; Bitcoin; Heterogeneous agents; EGARCH; Hodrick-Prescott filter; Markov regime-switching; ECONOMETRIC-ANALYSIS; TIME-SERIES; VOLATILITY; RETURNS; MARKET; MODEL; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s11156-020-00904-x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper develops and tests an intertemporal regime-switching asset pricing model characterized by heterogeneous agents that have different expectations about the persistence and volatility of bitcoin prices. The model is estimated using daily bitcoin price data from 2013 until 2020 whereby three types of agents are considered: mean-variance optimizers, speculators and fundamentalists, respectively. While mean-variance optimizers trade on the basis of conditional first and second moments of the return distribution, speculators engage in trend chasing and buy when prices are rising and sell when prices are declining. Fundamentalists trade on the basis of fundamental factors that can impact the value of bitcoin. The fractions of agents engaging in one strategy over another shows statistically substantial variation during high and low bitcoin price volatility regimes. Estimation results reveal the following. First, unlike in traditional asset classes, there is evidence of mean-variance optimizers. Second, there is evidence of speculators who engage in 'bandwagon behavior' and buy bitcoins during price appreciations and sell bitcoins during price declines. Finally, there is evidence of fundamentalists who trade bitcoins when fundamental factors deviate from their long-run trends. Remarkably, these fundamentalists exhibit contrarian-type behaviors during low price volatility regimes while behaving more like fundamental traders during high price volatility regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 645
页数:27
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   What can explain the price, volatility and trading volume of Bitcoin? [J].
Aalborg, Halvor Aarhus ;
Molnar, Peter ;
de Vries, Jon Erik .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 :255-265
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Irrational exuberance
[3]  
Ardiar D, 2019, FINANCE RES LETT
[4]   Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Bouri, Elie ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Roubaud, David .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 64 :74-81
[5]   Do the portfolios of small investors reflect positive feedback trading? [J].
Bange, MM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2000, 35 (02) :239-255
[6]   Asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrencies [J].
Baur, Dirk G. ;
Dimpfl, Thomas .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 173 :148-151
[7]   Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? [J].
Baur, Dirk G. ;
Hong, KiHoon ;
Lee, Adrian D. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2018, 54 :177-189
[8]  
Black F, 1976, P 1976 M BUS EC STAT, P177, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90024-6, DOI 10.1002/FUT.22086]
[9]   Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance [J].
Boehme, Rainer ;
Christin, Nicolas ;
Edelman, Benjamin ;
Moore, Tyler .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 29 (02) :213-238
[10]   Bitcoin for energy commodities before and after the December 2013 crash: diversifier, hedge or safe haven? [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Jalkh, Naji ;
Molnar, Peter ;
Roubaud, David .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (50) :5063-5073