Hydrocele formation following laparoscopic varicocelectomy

被引:65
作者
Hassan, JM [1 ]
Adams, MC [1 ]
Pope, JC [1 ]
Demarco, RT [1 ]
Brock, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Div Pediat Urol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
hydrocele; varicocele; laparoscopy; postoperative complications;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00402-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Hydrocele is a known complication of varicocelectomy. We evaluated the incidence of hydrocele following laparoscopic varicocelectomy at our institution. Materials and Methods: A total of 89 boys were treated with laparoscopic ligation of the spermatic vessels for clinically palpable varicoceles between January 2000 and December 2003. Charts were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 10 patients were excluded because they were lost to followup or presented with recurrent varicocele. Followup consisted of office visits with physical examinations at 1 and 12 months postoperatively. Patient charts were reviewed for perioperative variables, operative technique and complications. Results: Only 1 of 79 patients (1.3%) had persistent varicocele with a mean of 20.7 months of followup. A total of 18 patients (22.8%) had development of hydrocele postoperatively, of whom 9 required hydrocelectomy. In addition, 2 of these 9 patients needed repeat hydrocelectomy. Of the 57 patients with greater than 6 months of followup 29.8% had development of hydrocele. A higher rate of hydrocele formation (31.1%) was also noted in patients who underwent ligation and division of the spermatic vessels rather than ligation alone (11.8%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our series demonstrates a high rate of hydrocele formation following laparoscopic varicocelectomy, particularly in patients with longer followup. The incidence of hydrocele after laparoscopic varicocelectomy may be underreported. However, there appears to be a statistically significant decrease in hydroceles when the internal spermatic vessels are simply ligated rather than ligated and divided. Despite its ease and low failure rate, the standard technique of laparoscopic varicocelectomy requires reexamination, potentially allowing modifications that may decrease hydrocele formation, such as salvaging lymphatics and avoiding division of the vessels.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1079
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Treatment of varicocele: A comparative study of conventional open surgery, percutaneous retrograde sclerotherapy, and laparoscopy [J].
Abdulmaaboud, MR ;
Shokeir, AA ;
Farage, Y ;
El-Rahman, AA ;
El-Rakhawy, MM ;
Mutabagani, H .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (02) :294-300
[2]   Laparoscopic varicocelectomy with preservation of the testicular artery in adolescents [J].
Cohen, RC .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2001, 36 (02) :394-396
[3]   EFFECT OF HYDROCELE ON TESTIS AND SPERMATOGENESIS [J].
DANDAPAT, MC ;
PADHI, NC ;
PATRA, AP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 77 (11) :1293-1294
[4]  
DUBIN L, 1977, Urology, V10, P446, DOI 10.1016/0090-4295(77)90132-7
[5]   Incidence and management of hydrocele following varicocele surgery in children [J].
Esposito, C ;
Valla, JS ;
Najmaldin, A ;
Shier, F ;
Mattioli, G ;
Savanelli, A ;
Castagnetti, M ;
McKinley, G ;
Stayaert, H ;
Settimi, A ;
Jasonni, V ;
Guys, JM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (03) :1271-1273
[6]   MICROSURGICAL INGUINAL VARICOCELECTOMY WITH DELIVERY OF THE TESTIS - AN ARTERY AND LYMPHATIC SPARING TECHNIQUE [J].
GOLDSTEIN, M ;
GILBERT, BR ;
DICKER, AP ;
DWOSH, J ;
GNECCO, C .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (06) :1808-1811
[7]  
GOLDSTEIN M, 2002, CAMPBELLS UROLOGY, V2, P1572
[8]   Safety and efficiency of laparoscopic varicocelectomy in one hundred consecutive cases [J].
Iselin, CE ;
Almagbaly, U ;
Borst, F ;
Rohner, S ;
Schmidlin, F ;
Campana, A ;
Graber, P .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1997, 58 (04) :213-217
[9]   Results and complications of laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy [J].
Itoh, K ;
Suzuki, Y ;
Yazawa, H ;
Ichiyanagi, O ;
Miura, M ;
Sasagawa, I .
ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 2003, 49 (02) :107-110
[10]   Microsurgical repair of the adolescent varicocele [J].
Lemack, GE ;
Uzzo, RG ;
Schlegel, PN ;
Goldstein, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (01) :179-181