Biological and artificial cognition: what can we learn about mechanisms by modelling physical cognition problems using artificial intelligence planning techniques?

被引:5
作者
Chappell, Jackie [1 ]
Hawes, Nick [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Comp Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
comparative cognition; mechanism; function; modelling; planning; artificial intelligence; BEHAVIOR; SYSTEM; APES;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2012.0221
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Do we fully understand the structure of the problems we present to our subjects in experiments on animal cognition, and the information required to solve them? While we currently have a good understanding of the behavioural and neurobiological mechanisms underlying associative learning processes, we understand much less about the mechanisms underlying more complex forms of cognition in animals. In this study, we present a proposal for a new way of thinking about animal cognition experiments. We describe a process in which a physical cognition task domain can be decomposed into its component parts, and models constructed to represent both the causal events of the domain and the information available to the agent. We then implement a simple set of models, using the planning language MAPL within the MAPSIM simulation environment, and applying it to a puzzle tube task previously presented to orangutans. We discuss the results of the models and compare them with the results from the experiments with orangutans, describing the advantages of this approach, and the ways in which it could be extended.
引用
收藏
页码:2723 / 2732
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Articial intelligence: A modern approach
  • [2] Continual planning and acting in dynamic multiagent environments
    Brenner, Michael
    Nebel, Bernhard
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2009, 19 (03) : 297 - 331
  • [3] A ROBUST LAYERED CONTROL-SYSTEM FOR A MOBILE ROBOT
    BROOKS, RA
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1986, 2 (01): : 14 - 23
  • [4] Brown J. S., 1977, P ANN C ACM SEATTLE, P247
  • [5] Bryson J. J., 2003, Agent Technologies, Infrastructures, Tools, and Applications for E-Services. NODe 2002 Agent-Related Workshops. Revised Papers (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol.2592), P61
  • [6] Cognition in the wild: exploring animal minds with observational evidence
    Byrne, R. W.
    Bates, L. A.
    [J]. BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 7 (04) : 619 - 622
  • [7] Estimating the complexity of animal behaviour: How mountain gorillas eat thistles
    Byrne, RW
    Corp, N
    Byrne, JME
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR, 2001, 138 : 525 - 557
  • [8] Avian cognition: Understanding tool use
    Chappell, J
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (07) : R244 - R245
  • [9] Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations
    Chater, Nick
    Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
    Yuille, Alan
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (07) : 287 - 291
  • [10] What is comparable in comparative cognition?
    Chittka, Lars
    Rossiter, Stephen J.
    Skorupski, Peter
    Fernando, Chrisantha
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 367 (1603) : 2677 - 2685