Research fatigue in COVID-19 pandemic and post-disaster research: causes, consequences and recommendations

被引:56
作者
Patel, Sonny S. [1 ]
Webster, Rebecca K. [2 ]
Greenberg, Neil [3 ]
Weston, Dale [4 ]
Brooks, Samantha K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Psychol Med, London, England
[4] Publ Hlth England, Dept Emergency Response, Salisbury, Wilts, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Research fatigue; disaster policy; COVID-19; Research methods; Pandemic; Flooding; Disaster research; Willingness to participate; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1108/DPM-05-2020-0164
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose - Research fatigue occurs when an individual or population of interest tires of engaging with research, consequently avoiding further participation. This paper considers research fatigue in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, to identify contributory factors and possible solutions for future post-disaster research. Design/methodology/approach - The authors draw on examples from the literature and their own observations from the recruitment and data collection phases of qualitative and quantitative studies, to provide an overview of possible research fatigue in the current COVID-19 pandemic, with implications for future postdisaster research. Findings - People affected by disasters sometimes receive multiple requests for study participation by separate teams who may not necessarily be coordinating their work. Not keeping participants informed of the research process or outcomes can lead to disillusionment. Being overburdened with too many research requests and failing to see any subsequent changes following participation may cause individuals to experience research fatigue. Originality/value - Guidelines for researchers wishing to reduce the occurrence of research fatigue include ensuring greater transparency within research; sharing of results and using oversight or gatekeeper bodies to aid coordination. Failure to restrict the number of times that people are asked to participate in studies risks poor participation rates. This can subsequently affect the quality of information with which to inform policy-makers and protect the health of the public during the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health disasters/ emergencies.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 455
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, QUALITATIVE RES
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, Facing hazards and disasters: Understanding human dimensions
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, LANCET
  • [4] Baker S., 2020, Times Higher Education
  • [5] Response rate in academic studies - A comparative analysis
    Baruch, Y
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1999, 52 (04) : 421 - 438
  • [6] BMC, 2020, ISRCTN REG
  • [7] Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Mutz, Ruediger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (11) : 2215 - 2222
  • [8] Improving recruitment to health research in primary care
    Bower, Peter
    Wallace, Paul
    Ward, Elaine
    Graffy, Jonathan
    Miller, Julia
    Delaney, Brendan
    Kinmonth, Ann Louise
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2009, 26 (05) : 391 - 397
  • [9] British Psychological Society, 2018, Code of human research ethics
  • [10] Brooks Samantha K, 2020, Lancet, V395, P912, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8.]