Modelling and multi-objective optimization for simulation of hydrogen production using a photosynthetic consortium

被引:5
|
作者
Hernandez-Melchor, Dulce J. [2 ]
Camacho-Perez, Beni [3 ]
Rios-Leal, Elvira [4 ]
Alarcon-Bonilla, Jesus [3 ]
Lopez-Perez, Pablo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Estado Hidalgo, Escuela Super Apan, Carretera Apan Calpulalpan Km 8, Apan 43920, Hgo, Mexico
[2] Colegio Postgrad, Campus Montecillo, Texcoco 56230, Estado De Mexic, Mexico
[3] Univ Tecnol Tecamac, Quimicobiol A5, Carretera Fed Mexico Pachuca Km 37-5, Tecamac 55740, Estado De Mexic, Mexico
[4] CINVESTAV, IPN, Dept Biotecnol & Bioingn, Mexico City 2508, DF, Mexico
关键词
algae; consortia; cysteine; genetic algorithm; BIOHYDROGEN PRODUCTION; STATISTICAL OPTIMIZATION; MICROALGAE; FERMENTATION; ENERGY; CULTURES; NETWORK; GLUCOSE; GROWTH; OXYGEN;
D O I
10.1515/ijcre-2020-0019
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study was aimed at finding the optimal conditions for hydrogen production based on statistical experiments and using a simulation approach. A Plackett-Burman design and steepest ascent were used to screen the key factors to obtain the best hydrogen concentration. According to the regression analysis, cysteine, acetate, and aeration had the best effect. The optimal conditions, using the method of steepest ascent, were aeration (0.125 L/min), acetate (200 mg/L), cysteine (498 mg/L). Once this was determined, an experiment with more than two factors was considered. The combinations: acetate + cysteine without aeration and cysteine without aeration increased hydrogen concentration. These last two criteria were used to validate the dynamic model based on unstructured kinetics. Biomass, nitrogen, acetate, and hydrogen concentrations were monitored. The proposed model was used to perform the multi-objective optimization for various desired combinations. The simultaneous optimization for a minimum ratio of cysteine-acetate improved the concentration of hydrogen to 20 mg/L. Biomass optimized the concentration of hydrogen to 11.5 mg/L. The simultaneous optimization of reaction time (RT) and cysteine improved hydrogen concentration to 28.19 mg/L. The experimental hydrogen production was 11.4 mg/L at 24 h under discontinuous operation. Finally, the proposed model and the optimization methodology calculated a higher hydrogen concentration than the experimental data.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robust optimization using multi-objective particle swarm optimization
    Ono S.
    Yoshitake Y.
    Nakayama S.
    Artificial Life and Robotics, 2009, 14 (02) : 174 - 177
  • [22] Multi-objective optimization of an experimental integrated thermochemical cycle of hydrogen production with an artificial neural network
    Farsi, Aida
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Naterer, Greg F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (46) : 24355 - 24369
  • [23] Multi-objective optimization of SNG production from microalgae through hydrothermal gasification
    Mian, Alberto
    Ensinas, Adriano V.
    Marechal, Francois
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 76 : 170 - 183
  • [24] An efficient simulation optimization methodology to solve a multi-objective problem in unreliable unbalanced production lines
    Motlagh, Maedeh Mosayeb
    Azimi, Parham
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Madraki, Golshan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 138
  • [25] Multi-objective optimization and 4E analysis of a multigeneration system for hydrogen production using WHR in cement plants
    Dashtizadeh, Ebrahim
    Houshfar, Ehsan
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2025, 25
  • [26] Multi-objective optimization for GPU3 Stirling engine by combining multi-objective algorithms
    Luo, Zhongyang
    Sultan, Umair
    Ni, Mingjiang
    Peng, Hao
    Shi, Bingwei
    Xiao, Gang
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 94 : 114 - 125
  • [27] Methodology for Preliminary Design of Buildings Using Multi-Objective Optimization Based on Performance Simulation
    Zemero, Bruno Ramos
    de Lima Tastes, Maria Emilia
    Bezerra, Ubiratan Holanda
    Batista, Vitor dos Santos
    Carvalho, Carminda Celia M. M.
    JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2019, 141 (04):
  • [28] Multi-objective Collaborative Optimization of Production Scheduling for Discrete Manufacturing
    Yang, Xiao-ying
    Wang, Xi
    Sun, Hua-yue
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 2014, 2015, : 95 - 98
  • [29] Multi-objective optimization of integrated biodiesel production and separation system
    De, Riju
    Bhartiya, Sharad
    Shastri, Yogendra
    FUEL, 2019, 243 : 519 - 532
  • [30] Towards Multi-Objective Optimization of Sustainable Insect Production Chains
    Mouhrim, Nisrine
    Smetana, Sergiy
    Bhatia, Anita
    Mathys, Alexander
    Green, Ashley
    Peguero, Daniela
    Tonda, Alberto
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 352 - 355