Modifying effects of phenotypic plasticity on interactions among natural selection, adaptation and gene flow

被引:283
作者
Crispo, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ H3A 1B1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
adaptive divergence; adaptive phenotypic plasticity; canalization; cogradient variation; countergradient variation; divergent natural selection; ecological speciation; genetic assimilation; genetic differentiation; population genetics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01592.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Divergent natural selection, adaptive divergence and gene flow may interact in a number of ways. Recent studies have focused on the balance between selection and gene flow in natural populations, and empirical work has shown that gene flow can constrain adaptive divergence, and that divergent selection can constrain gene flow. A caveat is that phenotypic diversification may be under the direct influence of environmental factors (i.e. it may be due to phenotypic plasticity), in addition to partial genetic influence. In this case, phenotypic divergence may occur between populations despite high gene flow that imposes a constraint on genetic divergence. Plasticity may dampen the effects of natural selection by allowing individuals to rapidly adapt phenotypically to new conditions, thus slowing adaptive genetic divergence. On the other hand, plasticity may promote future adaptive divergence by allowing populations to persist in novel environments. Plasticity may promote gene flow between selective regimes by allowing dispersers to adapt to alternate conditions, or high gene flow may result in the selection for increased plasticity. Here I expand frameworks for understanding relationships among selection, adaptation and gene flow to include the effects of phenotypic plasticity in natural populations, and highlight its importance in evolutionary diversification.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1469
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Incipient speciation driven by phenotypic plasticity? Evidence from sympatric populations of Arctic charr [J].
Adams, CE ;
Huntingford, FA .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2004, 81 (04) :611-618
[2]   The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? [J].
Alpert, P ;
Simms, EL .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (03) :285-297
[3]  
BRADSHAW A. D., 1965, ADVANCE GENET, V13, P115, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60048-6
[4]   Local adaptation and cogradient selection in the alpine plant, Poa hiemata, along a narrow altitudinal gradient [J].
Byars, Sean G. ;
Papst, Warwick ;
Hoffmann, Ary A. .
EVOLUTION, 2007, 61 (12) :2925-2941
[5]   Phenotypic plasticity and the possible role of genetic assimilation: Hypoxia-induced trade-offs in the morphological traits of an African cichlid [J].
Chapman, LJ ;
Galis, F ;
Shinn, J .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2000, 3 (05) :387-393
[6]   PHENOTYPIC SIMILARITY AND THE EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE OF COUNTERGRADIENT VARIATION [J].
CONOVER, DO ;
SCHULTZ, ET .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1995, 10 (06) :248-252
[7]   Population genetic structure across dissolved oxygen regimes in an African cichlid fish [J].
Crispo, Erika ;
Chapman, Lauren J. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2008, 17 (09) :2134-2148
[8]   The Baldwin effect and genetic assimilation: Revisiting two mechanisms of evolutionary change mediated by phenotypic plasticity [J].
Crispo, Erika .
EVOLUTION, 2007, 61 (11) :2469-2479
[9]   Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration [J].
Daehler, CC .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2003, 34 :183-211
[10]  
DAY T, 1994, EVOLUTION, V48, P1723, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02208.x