Paternalism, Respect, and the Will

被引:61
作者
Groll, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Coll, Northfield, MN 55057 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/666500
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In general, we think that when it comes to the good of another, we respect that person's will by acting in accordance with what he wills because he wills it. I argue that this is not necessarily true. When it comes to the good of another person, it is possible to disrespect that person's will while acting in accordance with what he wills because he wills it. Seeing how this is so, I argue, enables us to clarify the distinct roles that the wills of competent and incompetent people should play in third-party deliberations about their welfare.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 720
页数:29
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, MORALITY FREEDOM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, PRACTICAL REASON NOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DEFINITION PEG
[4]   PATERNALISM DEFINED [J].
ARCHARD, D .
ANALYSIS, 1990, 50 (01) :36-42
[5]   MILL VERSUS PATERNALISM [J].
ARNESON, RJ .
ETHICS, 1980, 90 (04) :470-489
[6]  
Beauchamp T. L., 2010, STANDING PRINCIPLES, P103
[7]  
Buchanan AllenE., 1989, DECIDING OTHERS ETHI
[8]  
Darwall D., 2006, The SecondPerson Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability
[9]   Authority and Reasons: Exclusionary and Second-Personal [J].
Darwall, Stephen .
ETHICS, 2010, 120 (02) :257-278
[10]  
Darwall Stephen, 2009, REASONS ACTION, P151