Sensitivity analysis of inverse problems in EM non-destructive testing

被引:5
作者
Bilicz, Sandor [1 ]
机构
[1] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Broadband Infocommun & Electromagnet Theory, H-1111 Egry, Hungary
关键词
polynomials; sensitivity analysis; eddy current testing; nondestructive testing; inverse problems; chaos; stochastic processes; Sobol indices; polynomial chaos expansion surrogate model; entire inversion scheme; eddy-current NdT; inverse problem; EM-NdT; electromagnetic nondestructive testing; material defect parameters; EM field measurements; reconstructed defect parameters; model-based inversion; EM simulation; computational complexity; configuration uncertainties; MODEL;
D O I
10.1049/iet-smt.2019.0370
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The inverse problem of electromagnetic (EM) non-destructive testing (NdT) consists of reconstructing material defect parameters invoking EM field measurements. Uncertainties of the configuration (e.g. imprecise constitutive and geometrical parameters) are inevitably present; hence, the reconstructed defect parameters are also uncertain. In this study, the different sources of uncertainty are ranked by means of sensitivity analysis. The model-based inversion (involving EM simulation) is computationally demanding; moreover, sensitivity analysis usually requires a vast number of repeated runs of the inversion. To overcome the computational complexity, surrogate models are applied at different levels. Interpolation on a sparse grid is used as a surrogate model of the EM simulation. The sensitivity of the reconstructed defect parameters concerning configuration uncertainties is characterised by means of Sobol indices. The Sobol indices are obtained from a polynomial chaos expansion surrogate model of the entire inversion scheme. A numerical example drawn from eddy-current NdT is thoroughly analysed to illustrate the proposed methodology and to demonstrate its performance.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 551
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Uncertainty metric in model-based eddy current inversion using the adaptive Monte Carlo method [J].
Fan, Mengbao ;
Wu, Genlong ;
Cao, Binghua ;
Sarkodie-Gyan, Thomson ;
Li, Zhixiong ;
Tian, Guiyun .
MEASUREMENT, 2019, 137 :323-331
[12]   Stochastic Analysis of Scattered Field by Building Facades Using Polynomial Chaos [J].
Kersaudy, Pierric ;
Mostarshedi, Shermila ;
Sudret, Bruno ;
Picon, Odile ;
Wiart, Joe .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2014, 62 (12) :6382-6393
[13]   Non-parametric methods for global sensitivity analysis of model output with dependent inputs [J].
Mara, Thierry A. ;
Tarantola, Stefano ;
Annoni, Paola .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 72 :173-183
[14]  
Marelli Stefano, 2014, Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk. Quantification, Mitigation, and Management. Second International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM) and the Sixth International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis (ISUMA). Proceedings, P2554
[15]  
Marelli S., 2019, UQLABV12104 ETH ZUR
[16]   An efficient adaptive database sampling strategy with applications to eddy current signals [J].
Miorelli, R. ;
Artusi, X. ;
Reboud, C. .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2018, 80 :75-88
[17]   Stochastic Nondestructive Testing Simulation: Sensitivity Analysis Applied to Material Properties in Clogging of Nuclear Powerplant Steam Generators [J].
Moreau, O. ;
Beddek, K. ;
Clenet, S. ;
Le Menach, Y. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2013, 49 (05) :1873-1876
[18]   Calculation of eddy current testing probe signal with global approximation [J].
Pávó, J ;
Lesselier, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2006, 42 (04) :1419-1422
[19]   Optimized Solutions for Defect Characterization in 2-D Inverse Eddy Current Testing Problems Using Subregion Finite Element Method [J].
Rawashdeh, Mohammad R. ;
Rosell, Anders ;
Udpa, Lalita ;
Hoole, Samuel Ratnajeevan H. ;
Deng, Yiming .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2018, 54 (08)
[20]   INVERSION OF EDDY-CURRENT DATA AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF 3-DIMENSIONAL FLAWS [J].
SABBAGH, HA ;
RADECKI, DJ ;
BARKESHLI, S ;
SHAMEE, B ;
TREECE, JC ;
JENKINS, SA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1990, 26 (02) :626-629