The Clinical Utility of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia as a Routine Assessment in Nursing Homes

被引:19
作者
Jeon, Yun-Hee [1 ]
Li, Zhicheng [1 ]
Low, Lee-Fay [2 ,3 ]
Chenoweth, Lynn [3 ,4 ]
O'Connor, Daniel [5 ]
Beattie, Elizabeth [6 ]
Liu, Zhixin [2 ,3 ]
Brodaty, Henry [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Nursing Sch, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Dementia Collaborat Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Hlth Brain Ageing, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Southern Clin Sch, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[6] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
Depression; nursing homes; assessment; Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia; dementia; RESIDENTIAL AGED CARE; ELDERLY PEOPLE; LIFE; DISORDERS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jagp.2014.08.013
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the clinical utility of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) in nursing homes. Setting: 14 nursing homes in Sydney and Brisbane, Australia. Participants: 92 residents with a mean age of 85 years. Measurements: Consenting residents were assessed by care staff for depression using the CSDD as part of their routine assessment. Specialist clinicians conducted assessment of depression using the Semi-structured Clinical Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders for residents without dementia or the Provisional Diagnostic Criteria for Depression in Alzheimer Disease for residents with dementia to establish expert clinical diagnoses of depression. The diagnostic performance of the staff completed CSDD was analyzed against expert diagnosis using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The CSDD showed low diagnostic accuracy, with areas under the ROC curve being 0.69, 0.68 and 0.70 for the total sample, residents with dementia and residents without dementia, respectively. At the standard CSDD cutoff score, the sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 59% for the total sample, 69% and 57% for residents with dementia, and 75% and 61% for residents without dementia. The Youden index (for optimizing cut-points) suggested different depression cutoff scores for residents with and without dementia. Conclusion: When administered by nursing home staff the clinical utility of the CSDD is highly questionable in identifying depression. The complexity of the scale, the time required for collecting relevant information, and staff skills and knowledge of assessing depression in older people must be considered when using the CSDD in nursing homes.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 793
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Alexopoulos GS, 2009, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V8, P140
[2]   USE OF THE CORNELL SCALE IN NONDEMENTED PATIENTS [J].
ALEXOPOULOS, GS ;
ABRAMS, RC ;
YOUNG, RC ;
SHAMOIAN, CA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1988, 36 (03) :230-236
[3]   CORNELL SCALE FOR DEPRESSION IN DEMENTIA [J].
ALEXOPOULOS, GS ;
ABRAMS, RC ;
YOUNG, RC ;
SHAMOIAN, CA .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 23 (03) :271-284
[4]   DEPRESSIVE-DISORDERS AMONG ELDERLY PEOPLE IN LONG-TERM INSTITUTIONAL CARE [J].
AMES, D .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 27 (03) :379-391
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DOI DOI 10.1176/DSM10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890420249.DSM-IV-TR
[6]  
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2011, REV AG CAR FUND INST
[7]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2013, DEPR RES AG CAR AGE, V73
[8]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, RES AG CAR AG CAR PA
[9]   A Reliability and Validity Study of the Cornell Scale among Elderly Inpatients, Using Various Clinical Criteria [J].
Barca, Maria Lage ;
Engedal, Knut ;
Selbaek, Geir .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2010, 29 (05) :438-447
[10]   Course of Depression and Mortality Among Older Primary Care Patients [J].
Bogner, Hillary R. ;
Morales, Knashawn H. ;
Reynolds, Charles F., III ;
Cary, Mark S. ;
Bruce, Martha L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 20 (10) :895-903