Implementation of wind power in the Norwegian market; the reason why some of the best wind resources in Europe were not utilised by 2010

被引:16
作者
Blindheim, Bernt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Wind power; Support scheme; Concession; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.033
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Norway has some of the best wind resources in Europe. In 1999, the Norwegian Parliament committed to attain an annual onshore wind power production goal of 3.0 TWh by 2010; however, in 2010, onshore wind power production measured only 1.0 TWh. This article discusses the reasons that this goal was not achieved. The analysis addresses the key figures on the strategic, tactical and operational levels. This model is combined with a time line that seeks to define when different actors should have secured concessions' and funding to achieve the goal. After introducing the time line, a list of questions is introduced for these key actors. The three-level model, the time line and the questions constitute the analytical framework. Explanations for the failure to achieve the goal may be identified on all three levels. However, the primary explanatory factors were political uncertainty in the support scheme and wind power's role in the energy market in general; both of these factors are identified on the strategic level. Uncertainty on the strategic level influenced the lower levels, which led to bottlenecks in the concession process and jittery investors who thought that the risk of investment in wind power was too high. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 346
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, STOPP RASERING KYSTE
[2]  
Bergek A, 2011, ENERGIRIKDOMMENS PAR
[3]   Levelling the playing field? The influence of national wind power planning instruments on conflicts of interests in a Swedish county [J].
Bergek, Anna .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (05) :2357-2369
[4]   Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion [J].
Buen, Jorund .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (18) :3887-3897
[5]  
Cowell R., 2009, PLANNING THEORY PRAC, V10, P521
[6]  
Dicinia V., 2006, ENERG POLICY, V34, P461
[7]  
Enova, 2007, EN RES OG AKT 2006
[8]  
Enova, 2012, PERS INF
[9]   Policy instruments fostering wind energy projects - a multi-perspective evaluation approach [J].
Enzensberger, N ;
Wietschel, M ;
Rentz, O .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (09) :793-801
[10]   Phasing in wind-power in Norway: Network congestion and crowding-out of hydropower [J].
Forsund, Finn R. ;
Singh, Balbir ;
Jensen, Trond ;
Larsen, Cato .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (09) :3514-3520