Prosthetic Rehabilitation, Implant Survival and Quality of Life 2 to 5 Years after Resection of Oral Tumors

被引:15
|
作者
Katsoulis, Joannis [1 ]
Fierz, Janine [1 ]
IIzuka, Takeyuki [2 ]
Mericske-Stern, Regina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
dental implants; oral cancer; prosthetic rehabilitation; quality of life; survival rate; NECK-CANCER-PATIENTS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOMES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; RISK-FACTORS; HEAD; SMOKING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OROPHARYNX;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00328.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: After oral tumor resection, structural and functional rehabilitation by means of dental prostheses is complex, and positive treatment outcome is not always predictable. Purpose: The objective of the study was to report on oral rehabilitation and quality of life 25 years after resection of malignant oral tumors. Materials and Methods: Data of 46 patients (57 +/- 7 years) who underwent oral tumor surgery were available. More than 50% of tumors were classified T3 or T4. Open oro-nasal defects resulted in 12 patients and full mandibulary block resections in 23 patients. Comprehensive planning, implant placement, and prosthetic rehabilitation followed an interdisciplinary protocol. Analysis comprised tumor location, type of prostheses, implant survival, and quality of life. Results: Because of advanced tumor status, resections resulted in marked alteration of the oral anatomy requiring complex treatment procedures. Prosthetic rehabilitation comprised fixed and removable prostheses, with 104 implants placed in 28 patients (60%). Early implant loss was high (13%) and cumulative survival rate of loaded implants was <90% after 5 years. Prosthetic plans had to be modified because of side effects of tumor therapy, complications with implants and tumor recurrence. The majority of patients rated quality of life favorable, but some experienced impaired swallowing, dry mouth, limited mouth opening, appearance, and soreness. Conclusions: Some local effects of tumor therapy could not be significantly improved by prosthetic rehabilitation leading to functional and emotional disability. Many patients had passed away or felt too ill to fill the questionnaires. This case series confirms the complex anatomic alterations after tumor resection and the need for individual treatment approaches especially regarding prosthesis design. In spite of disease-related local and general restrictions, most patients gave a positive assessment of quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 72
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of life and survival rate after primary surgical treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study with 18 years of follow-up
    Bschorer, Maximilian
    Schneider, Daniel
    Goppold, Kai
    Sperling, Juliane
    Schoen, Gerhard
    Bschorer, Reinhard
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 50 (02) : 170 - 177
  • [22] Quality of life 2-10 years after combined treatment for advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer
    Klug, C
    Neuburg, J
    Glaser, C
    Schwarz, B
    Kermer, C
    Millesi, W
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 31 (06) : 664 - 669
  • [23] Effect of prosthetic rehabilitation on oral health-related quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review
    Quadri, Mir Faeq Ali
    Alamir, Abdul Wahab H.
    John, Tenny
    Nayeem, Maryam
    Jessani, Abbas
    Tadakamadla, Santhosh Kumar
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (04) : 3107 - 3118
  • [24] Quality of life after en bloc resection of tumors in the mobile spine
    Colman, Matthew W.
    Karim, Syed M.
    Lozano-Calderon, Santiago A.
    Pedlow, Frank X.
    Raskin, Kevin A.
    Hornicek, Francis J.
    Schwab, Joseph H.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (08) : 1728 - 1737
  • [25] Impact of halitosis on quality of life: Analysis before and after oral rehabilitation
    de Sousa, Joana A. B.
    Rodrigues, Luiza N. S.
    Silua, Melaine M. L.
    Rodrigues, Vandilson P.
    Pereira, Erika M.
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2021, 62 (02): : 94 - 99
  • [26] Quality of Life After Oral Cancer Resection and Free Flap Reconstruction
    Wang, Shuai
    Yin, Shoucheng
    Zhang, Ze-liang
    Su, Xingzhou
    Xu, Zhong-fei
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (08) : 1724 - 1732
  • [27] Weight loss and quality of life in patients surviving 2 years after gastric cancer resection
    Climent, M.
    Munarriz, M.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Dorcaratto, D.
    Ramon, J. M.
    Carrera, M. J.
    Fontane, L.
    Grande, L.
    Pera, M.
    EJSO, 2017, 43 (07): : 1337 - 1343
  • [28] Implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients after maxillofacial reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula flap: the effect on health-related quality of life
    Lodders, Johannes N.
    van Baar, Gustaaf J. C.
    Vergeer, Marije R.
    Jansen, Femke
    Schulten, Engelbert A. J. M.
    Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit, I
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
    Forouzanfar, Tymour
    Leusink, Frank K. J.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (06) : 5411 - 5420
  • [29] Prosthetic Survival and Complication Rate of Single Implant Treatment in the Periodontally Healthy Patient after 16 to 22 Years of Follow-Up
    Dierens, Melissa
    De Bruyn, Hugo
    Kisch, Jenoe
    Nilner, Krister
    Cosyn, Jan
    Vandeweghe, Stefan
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (01) : 117 - 128
  • [30] Patient-specific sub-periosteal zygoma implant for prosthetic rehabilitation of large maxillary defects after oncological resection
    Vosselman, N.
    Merema, B. J.
    Schepman, K. P.
    Raghoebar, G. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (01) : 115 - 117