Modeling Economic Effects of Vaccination Against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome: Impact of Vaccination Effectiveness, Vaccine Price, and Vaccination Coverage

被引:21
作者
Thomann, Beat [1 ]
Rushton, Jonathan [2 ]
Schuepbach-Regula, Gertraud [1 ]
Nathues, Heiko [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Vet Publ Hlth Inst, Vetsuisse Fac, Dept Clin Res & Vet Publ Hlth, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Infect & Global Hlth, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Bern, Dept Clin Vet Med, Vetsuisse Fac, Clin Swine, Bern, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
economic modeling; pig production; disease intervention; PRRS control; vaccination effectiveness; SYNDROME VIRUS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2020.00500
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) causes substantial financial losses in pig farms and economic losses to societies worldwide. Vaccination against PRRS virus (PRRSV) is a common intervention in affected farms. The aim of this study was to assess the economic impact and profitability of potential new PRRS vaccines with improved efficacy at animal, herd, and national level. Two vaccination strategies were modeled; (i) mass vaccination of sows only (MS) and (ii) mass vaccination of sows and vaccination of piglets (MSP), comprising different scenarios of vaccine effectiveness, vaccine price, and vaccination coverage. A farrow-to-finish farm with 1,000 working sows from a pig-dense region in Germany served as an example farm. Financial benefits were obtained from gross margin analyses and were defined as difference in gross margin between a PRRSV-infected farm without vaccination (baseline) and with vaccination (intervention). Financial benefits were highest if both sows and piglets (MSP) were vaccinated. In these scenarios, median annual net benefits per working sow ranged from euro170 to 340. If sows only were vaccinated (MS), estimated benefits attributable to vaccination were between euro148 and 270. Decisive variables for the estimation of national level benefits were the number of farmers switching from existing to a better protecting vaccine, the number of previously non-vaccinating herds adopting the new vaccine, and the effectiveness of the new vaccine relative to those already available. Benefits were greatest when the new vaccine was adopted by previously non-vaccinating herds. The analyses showed that vaccination against PRRS was beneficial for all modeled scenarios. The magnitude of benefits derived from vaccination was more susceptible to changes in vaccination effectiveness than to vaccine price changes. This study provides evidence to support future vaccine development. The estimates indicate that the introduction of more efficient vaccines might lead to substantial financial benefits, is of socio-economic importance and that new vaccines might significantly contribute to the reduction of disease burden.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SCHWEINEPRODUKTION 2, V20th
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INTERPIG 2013 PIG CO
[3]   Framework for Estimating Indirect Costs in Animal Health Using Time Series Analysis [J].
Barratt, Alyson S. ;
Rich, Karl M. ;
Eze, Jude I. ;
Porphyre, Thibaud ;
Gunn, George J. ;
Stott, Alistair W. .
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2019, 6
[4]   Farmers' Willingness to Pay for a Tuberculosis Cattle Vaccine [J].
Bennett, Richard ;
Balcombe, Kelvin .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 63 (02) :408-424
[5]  
BERNELINCOTTET C, 2019, VIRUSES BASEL, V0011
[6]  
BERNELINCOTTET C, 2019, VIRUSES BASEL, V0011, DOI [DOI 10.3390/V11060576, DOI 10.3390/v11060576]
[7]   Predicting vaccine effectiveness in livestock populations: A theoretical framework applied to PRRS virus infections in pigs [J].
Bitsouni, Vasiliki ;
Lycett, Samantha ;
Opriessnig, Tanja ;
Doeschl-Wilson, Andrea .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08)
[8]   Modified-live PRRSV subtype 1 vaccine UNISTRAIN® PRRS provides a partial clinical and virological protection upon challenge with East European subtype 3 PRRSV strain Lena [J].
Bonckaert C. ;
van der Meulen K. ;
Rodríguez-Ballarà I. ;
Sanz R.P. ;
Martinez M.F. ;
Nauwynck H.J. .
Porcine Health Management, 2 (1)
[9]   National decision-making on adopting new vaccines: a systematic review [J].
Burchett, H. E. D. ;
Mounier-Jack, S. ;
Griffiths, U. K. ;
Mills, A. J. .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2012, 27 :II62-II76
[10]   Efficacy of a modified-live virus vaccine in pigs experimentally infected with a highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus type 1 (HP-PRRSV-1) [J].
Canelli, Elena ;
Catella, Alessia ;
Borghetti, Paolo ;
Ferrari, Luca ;
Ognoa, Giulia ;
De Angelis, Elena ;
Bonilauri, Paolo ;
Guazzetti, Stefano ;
Nardini, Roberto ;
Martelli, Paolo .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 226 :89-96