Water-Energy Nexus: Addressing Stakeholder Preferences in Jordan

被引:16
作者
Komendantova, Nadejda [1 ]
Marashdeh, Leena [2 ]
Ekenberg, Love [1 ,3 ]
Danielson, Mats [1 ,3 ]
Dettner, Franziska [4 ]
Hilpert, Simon [4 ]
Wingenbach, Clemens [4 ]
Hassouneh, Kholoud [2 ]
Al-Salaymeh, Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal IIASA, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[2] Univ Jordan, Mech Engn Dept, Amman 11942, Jordan
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Comp & Syst Sci, POB 7003, SE-16407 Kista, Sweden
[4] Europe Univ Flensburg, Energy & Environm Management, Campus 1, D-24943 Flensburg, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
water-energy nexus; Jordan; energy policy; multi-criteria decision analysis; participatory governance and co-creation; compromise-oriented policy solutions; MIDDLE-EAST; DECISION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/su12156168
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The water and energy sectors are fundamentally linked. In Jordan, especially in the face of a changing climate, the water-energy nexus holds a number of challenges but also opportunities. A key point in exploring synergies is the identification of such, as well as the communication between the water and energy sectors. This paper promotes the importance of using a co-creative approach to help resolve opposing views and assessing stakeholder preferences in the context of the water-energy nexus in Jordan. A computer-supported, co-creative approach was used to evaluate stakeholder preferences and opinions on criteria and future scenarios for the energy and water sector in Jordan, identifying common difficulties and possibilities. The criteria describe socio-ecological aspects as well as techno-economic aspects for both systems. Discussing a set of preliminary scenarios describing possible energy and water futures ranked under a set of sector relevant criteria, a consensus between both stakeholder groups is reached. The robustness of results is determined, using a second-order probabilistic approach. The results indicate that there are no fundamental conflicts between the energy and water stakeholder groups. Applying a participatory multi-stakeholder, multi-criteria framework to the energy-water nexus case in Jordan promotes a clear understanding of where different stakeholder groups stand. This understanding and agreement can form the basis of a joint water-energy nexus policy used in the continued negotiation process between and within national and international cooperation, as well as promoting and developing acceptable suggestions to solve complex problems for both sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The Jordan Times
[2]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[3]   Fit-for-purpose urban wastewater reuse: Analysis of issues and available technologies for sustainable multiple barrier approaches [J].
Capodaglio, Andrea G. .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 51 (15) :1619-1666
[4]   Energy Issues in Sustainable Urban Wastewater Management: Use, Demand Reduction and Recovery in the Urban Water Cycle [J].
Capodaglio, Andrea G. ;
Olsson, Gustaf .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
[5]   Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment Using Only Qualitative Information on Utilities [J].
Caster, Ola ;
Noren, G. Niklas ;
Ekenberg, Love ;
Edwards, I. Ralph .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (06) :E1-E15
[6]   Handling imperfect user statements in real-life decision analysis [J].
Danielson, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2004, 3 (03) :513-534
[7]   A framework for analysing decisions under risk [J].
Danielson, M ;
Ekenberg, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 104 (03) :474-484
[8]  
Danielson M., 2018, LECT NOTES BUSINESS, V315, P190, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-92874-6_15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92874-6_15]
[9]   Computing upper and lower bounds in interval decision trees [J].
Danielson, Mats ;
Ekenberg, Love .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (02) :808-816
[10]   A second-order-based decision tool for evaluating decisions under conditions of severe uncertainty [J].
Danielson, Mats ;
Ekenberg, Love ;
Larsson, Aron .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2020, 191